Re: [gmx-users] shift the LJ potential

2017-10-10 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:26 PM Faezeh Pousaneh wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I have a given function for pseudo hard-sphere potential, There's no ability for GROMACS to support a true hard-sphere potential, because for such potentials the force is always zero or undefined. which has > different p

Re: [gmx-users] shift the LJ potential

2017-10-09 Thread Faezeh Pousaneh
Hi Mark, I have a given function for pseudo hard-sphere potential, which has different powers than LJ and a constant. I have to insert the constant in order to properly define the cut-off for my hard spheres. I just realized that I can use "user-specified potential". I guess I can include the cons

Re: [gmx-users] shift the LJ potential

2017-10-09 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Shifting the potential doesn't affect the sampling - only the forces do. How does that affect what you're thinking of? Mark On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:14 PM Faezeh Pousaneh wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to shift the LJ interaction between my particle by a constant, > (to remove attraction),

[gmx-users] shift the LJ potential

2017-10-09 Thread Faezeh Pousaneh
Hi, I would like to shift the LJ interaction between my particle by a constant, (to remove attraction), how can I change the function? Best regards -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't