Dear all,
I had trouble with the command g_x2top while trying to generate the
topology file for the molecule SAM. Error came up as followed.
Program g_x2top, VERSION 4.5.5
Source code file: g_x2top.c, line: 505
Fatal error:
No or incorrect atomname2type.n2t file found (looking for amber94.ff)
Why are you using PME-switch? Without explicitly choosing a switch?
Mark
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:45 PM, mcfc1301 mcfc1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I'm confused about Normal Mode Analysis of Gromacs. I have googled a lot
but
find little useful.
My Gromacs was installed in a
Quite right, sorry. P as the control variable is not implemented. NPT with
T as the control variable is, for example.
Mark
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Michael Shirts mrshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Pressure replica exchange is not in currently. It will be added
eventually (it's not that hard,
I'm not sure if pressure-based REMD is possible, but PLUMED-2.0 provides a
quite flexible implementation of Hamiltonian REMD for GROMACS. It may be
worth-checking it:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.5144
On 12 December 2013 12:11, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com wrote:
Quite right, sorry. P
Thanks Michael and Mark.
Implementation of the pressure based replica exchange will be useful for
membrane systems as membranes will be unstable using temperature based replica
exchange.
Btw, I noticed there is a recent paper on surface tension replica exchange
simulations of membranes:
Thanks for your response. When I used the tpr file it DID work.
When I tried the pdb file here is the error message I got:
Program editconf, VERSION 4.5.4
Source code file: tpxio.c, line: 1970
Fatal error:
Can not read file 50ps.pdb,
this file is from a Gromacs version which is
Hi,
I installed the newest version of gromacs on BGQ:
I used these options for whole installation
cmake -DGMX_MPI=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/gromacs-4.6.5/
-DGMX_DOUBLE=ON -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=$HOME/fftw/ ..
and this option for mdrun installation:
cmake -DGMX_MPI=ON
The most physical thing would be to prepare a system in a small NVT
box, then make the box bigger along one dimension, then do an NVT
simulation of that system and see what happens along that dimension
over time. Barostats are simply not designed to do nonequilibrium
right. They magically create
guess that right! but why do you think NVT scaling of velocities is physical
which should also affect the non-equilibrium expansion process?
thanks in advance
Santo
-
K. P. Santo
Post doctoral fellow
Department of Chemistry
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC, USA
--
You're right, NVE would probably be better! Otherwise, you would not
get expansionary cooling.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, kpsanto santo...@gmail.com wrote:
guess that right! but why do you think NVT scaling of velocities is physical
which should also affect the non-equilibrium expansion
10 matches
Mail list logo