> Are you sure that's better than mdrun's internal thread binding?
yes even with warnings I see better performance, so surely if we can remove
warnings and bind properly we will see much better performance than thread
MPI.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 3:41 AM Szilárd Páll wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12,
Hi all,
Quick question: in some of our models, the list of position restraints
as part of the permanent topology is created externally, based on the
atomic positions. Unfortunately, there is a slight bug in the restraint
generator and for a small portion of the restrained atoms the statements
Dear All
I am facing problems about phosphorylation of amino acid.
I use implicit water model for MD in gromacs 4.6.7, but I lack parameters about
phosphorylation in gbsa.itp (i.e. OS and P atomtype parameters).
Is there any references I can get?
Yours sincerely,
Tang
--
Gromacs Users
Hi all,
I am trying to modify the original GROMOS 54a7 force field files implemented in
GROMACS to add parameters of some new cations. But when I checked the
ffnonbonded.itp, I found that the charge parameter of CU2+, Zn2+ equals to
zero. Why? What does it mean? How GROMOS 54a7 force field
Dear Gromacs Users,
How do we determine the epsilon_r for a MD simulation? If we do a MD
simulation for a system with some molecules in water, what is the value for
epsilon_r? Is it equal to the relative dielectric permittivity of water?
Thank you.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search
Dear Experts,
Has anyone with amber 2018 able to generate ligand topologies for
Gromacs simulation. I got an error reporting "parmchk failed" while
executing "acpype -i FFF.pdb". I noticed that there is no "parmchk"
installed in the system. The current version installed during
installation of