Re: [gmx-users] Tables for user-defined potentials

2014-01-18 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/18/14, 7:56 PM, rankinb wrote: What are the formatting requirements for tables to be used as user-defined potentials? I found the example tables, but cannot find the details in the manual. It would be useful to have the requirements so I can save the tables in the correct format when gen

[gmx-users] TIP4ew water and velocities on dummy atoms

2014-01-18 Thread Antila Hanne
Dear experts, I converted a trajectory (.trr) containing a simulation of tip4ew water to .gro format. In the resulting .gro file, there are velocities also for the tip4 virtual sites MW. This confuses me, since these sites have no mass. How is this velocity calculated? I have been under the im

[gmx-users] Tables for user-defined potentials

2014-01-18 Thread rankinb
What are the formatting requirements for tables to be used as user-defined potentials? I found the example tables, but cannot find the details in the manual. It would be useful to have the requirements so I can save the tables in the correct format when generated. Otherwise, does anyone have any

Re: [gmx-users] Vacuum disappear after NPT equilibration?

2014-01-18 Thread Mark Abraham
Justin's suggestion sounds reasonable. Your approach would have to have enough water that there is no perturbation upon the water interacting with the bilayer from the water-vacuum interface. That seems prohibitive to compute and/or demonstrate... Mark On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Guangwei J

Re: [gmx-users] Vacuum disappear after NPT equilibration?

2014-01-18 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/18/14, 3:05 PM, Guangwei Jiang wrote: Hi, Mark, I hope to introduce the ions into two water compartments above and below the lipid bilayers. But with the vacuum, I can block the ions flowing into the other side. This may overcome the case from periodic boundary condition. But I need to

Re: [gmx-users] grompp error - no molecules were defined in the system

2014-01-18 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/18/14, 2:20 PM, rankinb wrote: When running grompp, I am receiving the error "No molecules were defined in the system." I have a relatively simple topology and .gro file. I cannot locate the source of the error. Does anyone have any suggestions? Here is an example of the .gro and .top

Re: [gmx-users] protein-ligand complex

2014-01-18 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/18/14, 3:14 AM, Mahboobeh Eslami wrote: dear justin I thank you for your friendly guide Can I assume some of torsion steady and don't change them for getting results better of docking ? can i reduce rotatable bonds for my ligand in docking process then do MD simulation? if i reduce rotata

Re: [gmx-users] How to define pull-init for two pull groups

2014-01-18 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/17/14, 8:06 PM, Rini Gupta wrote: Dear gmx-users, Thanks for the reply. That means if I will use the frames generated by script (setup-umbrella.py) it will not generate a sufficient overlap between adjacent windows for this system? What I'm saying is that I know the scripts, input fil

Re: [gmx-users] Vacuum disappear after NPT equilibration?

2014-01-18 Thread Guangwei Jiang
Hi, Mark, I hope to introduce the ions into two water compartments above and below the lipid bilayers. But with the vacuum, I can block the ions flowing into the other side. This may overcome the case from periodic boundary condition. But I need to have such a stable structure with vacuum. Do y

[gmx-users] Compressibility in lipid membranes

2014-01-18 Thread panzu
Hello to everybody, I am performing a simulation of a lipid membrane made of DPPC molecules in a water solvent and I am fixing certain surface tension. ; Pressure coupling = Pcoupl = berendsen Pcoupltype = surface-tension ; Time constant (ps), compressibility

Re: [gmx-users] Installing Gromacs 4.6.5 - Problem with FFTW

2014-01-18 Thread Maps99
Hi Mark, the reason why I am confused is, that I thought cmake checks if everything is fine or not. So at the point I tried "cmake .." for the first time, cmake started all these tests and finally I got the answer I should install FFTW3 and so I did. I did this with typing "make". Because "ma

[gmx-users] grompp error - no molecules were defined in the system

2014-01-18 Thread rankinb
When running grompp, I am receiving the error "No molecules were defined in the system." I have a relatively simple topology and .gro file. I cannot locate the source of the error. Does anyone have any suggestions? Here is an example of the .gro and .top file that I am using. Thanks. HSb

Re: [gmx-users] Installing Gromacs 4.6.5 - Problem with FFTW

2014-01-18 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, I am trying to install Gromacs 4.6.5 on Kubuntu. My Kubuntu skills are not > that good, so I kept close to the Install Instructions. I skipted the > "Quick > and Dirty Instrucitons" and now I should be at the point "4.1 Configuring > with CMake". When I insert "cmake ..", I recieve: > > > Can

Re: [gmx-users] choose the reference structure of Gromacs

2014-01-18 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, See g_rms -h first ;-) Mark On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Ahmet yıldırım wrote: > Dear users, > > How do Gromacs choose the reference structure for the fit the trajectory? > For example: > g_rms -f traj.xtc -s topol.tpr > > The reference structure is first frame (-dump 0:closest to the

Re: [gmx-users] Vacuum disappear after NPT equilibration?

2014-01-18 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Why are you trying to maintain a region of vacuum while changing the density of the rest? Mark On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Guangwei Jiang wrote: > Thanks, Justin! > > But I am still puzzled about the way to do equilibration without NPT. > > How can we realize the equilibration for a r

Re: [gmx-users] tutor files

2014-01-18 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, No, those are long out of date. That page has been removed for the upcoming 5.0 release of GROMACS. Please check out http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Tutorials or on Google for more up-to-date material. Mark On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:06 AM, John Doe wrote: > Hi All, > > Are the tutor

Re: [gmx-users] problems with Cysteines

2014-01-18 Thread Steve
Thanks Justin I appreciate you help...Your comments made it clear... Steve -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/problems-with-Cysteines-tp5013859p5013870.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Ple

[gmx-users] Installing Gromacs 4.6.5 - Problem with FFTW

2014-01-18 Thread GtrAngus
Hi guys, I am trying to install Gromacs 4.6.5 on Kubuntu. My Kubuntu skills are not that good, so I kept close to the Install Instructions. I skipted the "Quick and Dirty Instrucitons" and now I should be at the point "4.1 Configuring with CMake". When I insert "cmake ..", I recieve: Can anyone

[gmx-users] choose the reference structure of Gromacs

2014-01-18 Thread Ahmet yıldırım
Dear users, How do Gromacs choose the reference structure for the fit the trajectory? For example: g_rms -f traj.xtc -s topol.tpr The reference structure is first frame (-dump 0:closest to the first frame) of the trajectory for above command? -- Ahmet Yıldırım -- Gromacs Users mailing list *

Re: [gmx-users] Vacuum disappear after NPT equilibration?

2014-01-18 Thread Guangwei Jiang
Thanks, Justin! But I am still puzzled about the way to do equilibration without NPT. How can we realize the equilibration for a reasonable density in such vacuum scheme? Forgive me the stupid question. Thanks very much! Regards, Guangwei From: gromac

Re: [gmx-users] protein-ligand complex

2014-01-18 Thread Mahboobeh Eslami
dear justin I thank you for your friendly guide Can I assume some of torsion steady and don't change them for getting results better of docking  ? can i reduce rotatable bonds for my ligand in docking process then do MD simulation? if i reduce rotatable bonds, i will get much better results of d