Hi Raffaella,
First: You absolutely shouldn’t remove all acceleration in cases like this -
that would hit your performance by ~50%. Instead, you can pick the greatest
common divisor, which is SSE4.1.
Second, the segfault happens because we use a timing instruction. You can
disable this by
Is there any problem when we analyse the protein-ligand complex simulation
withPBC problem without using -trjconv?
Thank you
kannan s
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
manual 4.1.1 (gromacs-4.5.5)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Zhikun caiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear users,
I would like to simulate a Lennard-Jones system with one or two species of
atoms. But my knowledge is only about Lennard-Jones 6-12 potential and I
haven't figured out how to use that
Note that both Opteron 2354 K10/Barcelona (http://goo.gl/6hyfO) and
the Xeon 53xx / Clovertown (http://goo.gl/6hyfO) are quite old and
none of them supports SSE4.1. Hence, pick SSE2 and build distributable
binaries (AFAIK Clovertown does not support the rdtscp instructions).
Also note that
Thank you for your reply Tsjerk..
I do many Trjconv -pbc mol -ur compact -center. but it doesn't help..
this is PBC. if i center protein the ligand goes other side at end of
simulation. if i center ligand, then protein goes... if i center both, its
trajectory is same as old one.
How to overcome
On 1/31/14, 7:09 AM, kannan wrote:
Thank you for your reply Tsjerk..
I do many Trjconv -pbc mol -ur compact -center. but it doesn't help..
this is PBC. if i center protein the ligand goes other side at end of
simulation. if i center ligand, then protein goes... if i center both, its
Dear gromacs users
We are pleased to inform you that we are holding a tutorial and user meeting
for PLUMED, which is a small code that can be plugged into gromacs and other MD
codes, from the 28th May to the 2nd June of this year in Belfast, Northern
Ireland.
The first three days of this
That's just weird. The Cuda API error detected does not sound good -
perhaps it's a sing of a CUDA runtime bug?
Maybe. I don't really have a known good configuration to work from, so
locating the cause of error is a bit of a shot in the dark.
I suggest that you try CUDA 5.0 and see if that
FYI: GROMACS is known to work on IVB-E + K20 hardware, so I'm still
leaning toward thinking that this is either hardware or CUDA software
error.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:57 PM, AOWI (Anders Ossowicki)
a...@novozymes.com wrote:
That's just weird. The Cuda API error detected does not sound good -
FYI: GROMACS is known to work on IVB-E + K20 hardware, so I'm still leaning
toward thinking that this is either hardware or CUDA software error.
Good to know. If we go ahead with this hardware setup, I might return.
The next thing I'd have suggested is to plug the card into another machine
Thanks a lot Justin. I will try to find them and put into my .top file.
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of Justin Lemkul
jalem...@vt.edu
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014
Dear Justin
I have a problem with centering the
hetrodimer protein in the dodecahedron or octahedron box, the related
commands are:
1.pdb2gmx -f A1CBIII-W3.pdb -ff
charmm27 -water tip3p -ignh -o conf.pdb -nochargegrp -merge all
-posrefc 1000 -renum
2.editconf -f conf.pdb -o boxed.pdb -c
-d 1.0
On 1/31/14, 11:53 AM, Mostafa Javaheri wrote:
Dear Justin
I have a problem with centering the hetrodimer protein in the dodecahedron or
octahedron box, the related commands are:
1.pdb2gmx -f A1CBIII-W3.pdb -ff charmm27 -water tip3p -ignh -o conf.pdb
-nochargegrp -merge all -posrefc 1000
Dear GROMACS users,
I am running membrane protein simulation.
I have shrunk the area with the help of inflate.pl script.When I run energy
minimisation I get this following error...
Steepest Descents:
Tolerance (Fmax) = 1.0e+03
Number of steps=
Thank you very much for your valuable suggestion Justin...
best regards,
kannan s
I
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Justin Lemkul [via GROMACS]
ml-node+s5086n5014192...@n6.nabble.com wrote:
On 1/31/14, 7:09 AM, kannan wrote:
Thank you for your reply Tsjerk..
I do many Trjconv -pbc
15 matches
Mail list logo