Hi Chaban,
they are less than 5 Angstrom.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:30 AM, V.V.Chaban wrote:
> what's the size of the hole?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Maryam Kowsar
> wrote:
> > Dear users,
> >
> > I want to fill a mesoporous system with water or any other molecules or
> > ato
hello,
Thanks for yours valuable comments,
So Which force fields do you people recommend to simulate gas phase systems?Can
we simulate gas and liquid mixtures in one go?
RegardsSwapnil
On Monday, 22 June 2015 6:26 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 6/22/15 8:47 AM, V.V.Chaban wrote:
>
On 6/22/15 9:47 PM, RJ wrote:
Dear Tsjerk,
I already set " nstxout-compressed = 5000 ; write .xtc trajectory every 10.0
ps " in my mdp file
Confirm the settings in the .log file.
My cpt file checking through gmxcheck are reading the 100 ns as last frame but
dont how i miss this .x
Dear Tsjerk,
I already set " nstxout-compressed = 5000 ; write .xtc trajectory every
10.0 ps " in my mdp file
My cpt file checking through gmxcheck are reading the 100 ns as last frame but
dont how i miss this .xtc and .trr file? It could happen lack of memory ? Any
possible to get those
what's the size of the hole?
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Maryam Kowsar wrote:
> Dear users,
>
> I want to fill a mesoporous system with water or any other molecules or
> atoms. I tested genbox -cp .gro -cs spc216.gro -o but water molecules only
> surround the mespore not in the holes. Ar
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:50 PM Peter Stern
wrote:
> Even though it's called aminoacids.n.tdb? Or a different name, e.g.
> nucleicacids.n.tdb?
> One problem is that I eventually have to deal with tens, maybe hundreds of
> complexes.
> Some, of course, will have the normal 5' nucleotide. Wi
Hi,
The solution suggested by Parvez should work, but really you should not
install this version of GROMACS any more (at least get the bug fixes in
4.5.7!) and should do so only after reading the install instructions on the
GROMACS webpage, which deal specifically with the issue you report.
Mark
Peter, it should be in aminoacids, just a legacy file naming.
Alex
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Peter Stern
wrote:
> Even though it's called aminoacids.n.tdb? Or a different name, e.g.
> nucleicacids.n.tdb?
> One problem is that I eventually have to deal with tens, maybe hundreds of
> com
Even though it's called aminoacids.n.tdb? Or a different name, e.g.
nucleicacids.n.tdb?
One problem is that I eventually have to deal with tens, maybe hundreds of
complexes.
Some, of course, will have the normal 5' nucleotide. Will I be able to choose
the appropriate n.tdb file for each case
Thanks Parvez! but it was not the solution. do you have any other ideas to
help?
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:42 PM, mah maz wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am trying to install a new version of gromacs(rather than rpm) on my
> system. I apply these commands:(in root while im superuser)
> tar -xzvf fftw-3.3
On 6/22/15 2:36 PM, Peter Stern wrote:
I have a chain of RNA in complex with a protein.
The pdb file is missing the first two nucleotides and starts with the third
including the PO2 group.
pdb2gmx identifies this as the 5' terminal nucleotide and tries to create the topology
from rna.rtp usin
I have a chain of RNA in complex with a protein.
The pdb file is missing the first two nucleotides and starts with the third
including the PO2 group.
pdb2gmx identifies this as the 5' terminal nucleotide and tries to create the
topology from rna.rtp using RA5 as the "residue" type.
Thus it doesn
Hi Michael,
There is one more question, I still could not get why do I see that big
jump in potential energy?
I understand all bulk is drifting in the box because of the COM removal
step is omitted for md-vv but how this issue can effect the potential
energy?
best
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:05 PM
Hi All
I want to align small residues based on 3 atom names only (ignoring rest of
the atoms) and confrms does not require same number of atoms: first.pdb
with 7 atoms and second.pdb with 3 atoms.
echo "0" "0"| gmx confrms -f1 first.pdb.pdb -f2 second.pdb -no -name -o
fit.pdb
I am getting error
Dear users,
I want to fill a mesoporous system with water or any other molecules or
atoms. I tested genbox -cp .gro -cs spc216.gro -o but water molecules only
surround the mespore not in the holes. Are there any commands in gromacs?
thank you.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the a
Thanks Michael.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Michael Shirts wrote:
> At some point, a COM removal step was omitted for md-vv. A change has been
> proposed in in gerrit for a while (See
> https://gerrit.gromacs.org/#/c/4649/
> and https://gerrit.gromacs.org/#/c/4467/ ), but one of the develo
At some point, a COM removal step was omitted for md-vv. A change has been
proposed in in gerrit for a while (See https://gerrit.gromacs.org/#/c/4649/
and https://gerrit.gromacs.org/#/c/4467/ ), but one of the developers asked
to have the source of the problem traced to understand better what happ
Dear gromacs users,
I am trying to simulate a ligand using REMD method in explicit solvent with
the charmm force field. When I try to equilibrate my system I get this
error :
Double sids (0, 1) for atom 26
Double sids (0, 1) for atom 27
Double sids (0, 1) for atom 28
Double sids (0, 1) for atom 2
Hi all,
I was using md-vv as an integrator however I discovered that all bulk was
moving (drifting) during the simulation.
Than I changed the integrator and used md. The bulk molecules did not move
during the simulation, just stayed in the middle of box.
I attached the potential and kinetic ene
On 6/22/15 8:47 AM, V.V.Chaban wrote:
Not all organics is polar, Justin. :-)
Obviously.
Hydrogen bond length, and hence, energy are well limited by sigma in
LJ. Even if dipole moments are overestimated by 20%, this should not
lead to a proportional increase in the hydrogen bond strength.
Not all organics is polar, Justin. :-)
Hydrogen bond length, and hence, energy are well limited by sigma in
LJ. Even if dipole moments are overestimated by 20%, this should not
lead to a proportional increase in the hydrogen bond strength.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote
Thanks Justin
Regrads
Lovika
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 6/22/15 7:55 AM, Lovika Moudgil wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> Can anybody tell from where I will get this tip3p.gro file ...I have
>> tip4p.gro and tip5p.gro ...but not tip3p.gro
>> E
On 6/22/15 7:55 AM, Lovika Moudgil wrote:
Hi everyone
Can anybody tell from where I will get this tip3p.gro file ...I have
tip4p.gro and tip5p.gro ...but not tip3p.gro
Error is ::
*Library file tip3p.gro not found in current dir nor in default
directories.(You can set the direct
On 6/22/15 7:10 AM, nazli kashani javid wrote:
thanks for your clear answer.
Is there any reasonable method for calculating free energy of solvation for
my protein? :-(
Try MM/PBSA or MM/GBSA calculations.
-Justin
--
==
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph
Hi Eugen,
It's indeed x1,y1,z1,x2,y2,z2,...,xN,yN,zN
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Command Line
wrote:
> Hi, Does some know the exact order of the hessian matrix elements?
> There are 3N x 3N elements, which match up with the N atoms.
> But I'm not sure how the x, y, z eleme
Hi everyone
Can anybody tell from where I will get this tip3p.gro file ...I have
tip4p.gro and tip5p.gro ...but not tip3p.gro
Error is ::
*Library file tip3p.gro not found in current dir nor in default
directories.(You can set the directories to search with the GMXLIB path
variable)
I'm trying to show thermodynamic stabilities of my protein from free energy
simulation. And I chose free energy of solvation, so if I can't use this
method how can I show thermodynamic stabilities of my protein?
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:40 PM, nazli kashani javid
wrote:
> thanks for your clea
thanks for your clear answer.
Is there any reasonable method for calculating free energy of solvation for
my protein? :-(
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 6/22/15 5:53 AM, nazli kashani javid wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> I'm trying to calculate free energy of sol
On 6/22/15 5:53 AM, nazli kashani javid wrote:
Dear all
I'm trying to calculate free energy of solvation according to Justin's
tutorial for my protein in water.
Is it true to follow that tutorial for my protein? any special changes in
MDP file is necessary ?
You shouldn't use this method a
If you check out the second paper I linked to before ( the shameless plug to my
own work!), this should give you a good idea. That said, this work is a from a
few years ago now so there are some other parameters that are also now
available (google should find them for you).
Cheers
Tom
___
Thanks to all for the useful replies. BTW, which force field will be good
option for simulating united-atom (acyl chain) POPC membranes?
Many thanks
Anu
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Thomas Piggot wrote:
> Good to see the membrane structures have been changed/fixed. I think it
> was December
Dear all
I'm trying to calculate free energy of solvation according to Justin's
tutorial for my protein in water.
Is it true to follow that tutorial for my protein? any special changes in
MDP file is necessary ?
If there is no differences for systems to calculate free energy of
solvation accordi
Hi RJ,
For an XTC file, you need to set nstxtcout (GMX 4.x) or nstxout_compressed
(GMX 5). A TPR file is a run _input_ file and is not generated as output.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:11 AM, RJ wrote:
> Dear gmx.
>
>
> I run 100ns simulation of my protein with ligand. After compl
33 matches
Mail list logo