Em 22/07/2015 14:51, Christopher Neale chris.ne...@alum.utoronto.ca
escreveu:
Dear Users:
I believe that gromacs 5 pdb2gmx does not faithfully reproduce the
AMBER99sb-ILDN force field.
It is not exclusive behavior for any particular FF. I've got same error for
Gromos54a7. If one uses multiple
Hi Chris and everyone,
The bug in question affects 5.0.x and it is related to the hackblock
handling of pdb2gmx. As the above linked redmine page indicates, it is
indeed a duplicate of previously reported issues (#1755 and #1755). It has
been first identified and fixed as a bug a few weeks ago,
Thank you for your response! I used the code that you provided and my
micelle is now in the middle.
My mass ratio for isooctane is about 88% if you were still curious. Once
again thank you for your help.
Thank you,
Tyler Cropley
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:57 AM, ABEL Stephane 175950
Hello
To center your RM inside teh box you could use to successive trjconv commands
with pbc cluster and mol
in index.ndx
0 : all
1 AOT
2 water
3 AOT_Water
4 ISO
1 -- select 1 1 0 (or 2 2 0)
echo 1 1 0 | trjconv -f my_initial.xtc -s my_tpr.tpr -pbc cluster -ur compact
-center -o
Hi all,
I am running energy minimization and grompp is complaining about following
error. I am using Gromacs version 4.6.3. On Gromacs website it is saying
that GROMOS96 54A7 files from ATB website were added to 4.6.2 and later
versions right?
Hi all,
I am running energy minimization and grompp is complaining about following
error. I am using Gromacs version 4.6.3. On Gromacs website it is saying
that GROMOS96 54A7 files from ATB website were added to 4.6.2 and later
versions right?
Hi all,
Sorry apparently my previous emails the shared links just contained one
file, apologize for that.
I am running energy minimization and grompp is complaining about following
error. I am using Gromacs version 4.6.3. On Gromacs website it is saying
that GROMOS96 54A7 files from ATB website
If the error bar exceeds the absolute value of diffusion coefficient,
just round the number, as I exemplified below.
The error bar should correspond to the last digit of the result value,
e.g. 5 +/ -2; 0.0002 +/- 0.0001; 0.4E6 +/- 0.2E6, etc.
My immediate guess is that the problem in the code is
Hmm. If you exclude PBC manually, do you get a pick when expected?
Professor Vitaly V. Chaban
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Navneet Chaturvedi
14.navn...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Scientists
My system contains Protein+ZN+ions+water. Box size from protein surface is
1.0nm. After production
How to select isovalue in spatial density distribution for solvation shell
and bulk around the solute?
--
*Mayank Kumar Dixit *
Senior Research Fellow
Molecular Dynamics lab
Department of Chemistry
IIT Bombay
Powai, Mumbai.
Mob No 9820697156
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the
Thanks a lot Teemu, i will try!
Best regards,
Natalia
2015-07-21 7:48 GMT-04:00 Teemu Murtola teemu.murt...@gmail.com:
It's not clear from your question what you exactly want to calculate, but
g_sgangle (Gromacs 4.6 and earlier) and gmx gangle (Gromacs 5.0+) can
calculate angles between
Krzysztof,
Thanks for getting back. I was interested in the -version output of the
problematic binary hoping to pinpoint the source of the issues you reported
- especially because that error should not have occurred to begin with
(unless you changed compiler flags manually!).
The poor
you can also look at this tutorial if you want to have starting point for
generating topologies:
http://www.esi.umontreal.ca/~pelletjo/gromacs/
max
On Jul 21, 2015, at 9:52 AM, gozde ergin
gozdeeer...@gmail.commailto:gozdeeer...@gmail.com wrote:
Gromacs has OPLSAA force field. You can use
Dear Eudes:
There are two issues: The first issue is the fact that you've got a sampling
problem near the bilayer center. The second issue is the periodic bumps that
you see in your PMFs. I'll take the second part first.
The source of the periodic bumps in PMFs from umbrella sampling is, to
14 matches
Mail list logo