Hi,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM Szilárd Páll wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Venkat Reddy wrote:
> > Gromacs-5.1 version can not read xtc files. However, it can access single
> > frame gro/pdb files.
> >
>
> That's a bold claim that IMO requires equally strong proof.
>
I agree with
Thank you Mark and Erik,
Van
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015, Mark Abraham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:47 PM Cuong Nguyen > wrote:
>
> > Dear Gromacs users,
> >
> > I would like to work out the energy (total and kinetic) as a function of
> > the distance from the center of mass o
Dear all,
What does vdw and coulomb modifier do in simulation?. Does these option
affect simulation accuracy. I did not find these term in literature or any
book, why did gromacs introduce these option?
Thanks
Masrul
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.groma
Hi everyone,
I would like to use Gromacs to do Thermodynamic Integration (TI) from liquid
water (TIP4P model) to an ideal gas, to find the relative free energy. To do
this, I believe one generally integrates above the critical point by
increasing the temperature above the critical temperature
Dear all,
As the Verlet cut-off scheme does not support energygrp-excl parameter yet,
we are looking for an alternative to exclude all non bonded interactions
between the frozen atoms.
The gromacs manual (section 5.4) states that all the non bonded
interactions between the pairs in the [ exclusio
Dear list,
I have my own force field working folder so I cloned the entire top folder to
no mess with the original files. I added residues to the residue type file to
add my residues to the protein group. My FF is included due to the GMXLIB
environmental variable but my modified residuestype.da
I used this:
> cmake .. -DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON -DREGRESSIONTEST_DOWNLOAD=OFF
> -DGMX_USE_RDTSCP=OFF
But Still:
Test project /home/simon/gromacs-5.0.6/build
Start 1: TestUtilsUnitTests
1/15 Test #1: TestUtilsUnitTests ...***Exception:
Illegal 0.29 sec
Start 2: Prepr
Dear all,
As the Verlet cut-off scheme does not support energygrp-excl parameter yet,
we are looking for an alternative to exclude all non bonded interactions
between the frozen atoms.
The gromacs manual (section 5.4) states that all the non bonded
interactions between the pairs in the [ exclusio
On 10/1/15 9:07 AM, badamkhatan togoldor wrote:
Dear Gromacs Users,I would like to use g_membed to insert my peptide into
membrane. But I got this errors and notes in grompp
ERROR 1 [file membed.mdp]:
Energy group exclusions are not (yet) implemented for the Verlet scheme
NOTE 4 [file memb
TL; DR
If you want to investigate the issue further check my reply here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.gromacs.user/80120
--
Szilárd
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Zhongjin He wrote:
> Dear GMX users,
>
>
> Recently I encountered a strange problem in using GPU GROMACS 5.0.6
Hi Gábor,
Without more details (and little experience with martini systems) I can
suggest: tweaking DD so you don't end up with a too small box wrt the
number of cells by:
- Changing the number of ranks by using less/more cores to get a convenient
decomposition; I assume you had 6x4x4 before on 96
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Parker de Waal
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I recently started to explore GROMACS (switching over from AMBER) and need
> some help understanding how to launch GPU+CPU simulations.
>
> GROMACS 5.0.6 was compiled with the following cmake arguments:
> cmake .. -DGMX_
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Venkat Reddy wrote:
> Hi
> Gromacs-5.1 version can not read xtc files. However, it can access single
> frame gro/pdb files.
>
That's a bold claim that IMO requires equally strong proof.
In your other mail to the list you were talking about a 32-bit Ubuntu VM.
Are
Hi,
I think its solved, I used -center option but now rather selecting full
polymer I selected some of the central residue in polymer chain. Now box
looks good and polymer is not broken.
JIom
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:43 PM, gromacs query
wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> With 'pbc whole' polymer remains
My guess is that you need to turn off RDTSCP:
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Installation_Instructions_5.0#portability-aspects
--
Szilárd
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Simon Dürr
wrote:
> I have problems installing Gromacs on a VirtualBox machine.
>
> Stats of the System:
> Lubuntu 32
Hi Victor,
With 'pbc whole' polymer remains broken in pbc and the octahedron box looks
weird too.
JIom
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Victor Rosas Garcia
wrote:
> Have you tried the option "-pbc whole" instead of "-pbc mol"?
>
> Victor
>
> 2015-10-01 6:43 GMT-05:00 gromacs query :
>
> > Hi Al
I have problems installing Gromacs on a VirtualBox machine.
Stats of the System:
Lubuntu 32bit, 14.04 LTS
build-essential and cmake are installed.
I follow the instructions:
> tar xfz gromacs-5.0.6.tar.gz
> cd gromacs-5.0.6
> mkdir build
> cd build
> cmake .. -DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON -DREGRESSIONT
Hi,
Can you please open an issue on redmine.gromacs.org and attach your
CMakeCache.txt file to the issue.
To work around the issue, you'll likely have to disable NVML support which
ATM requires removing all lines that start with "NVML_" from your
CMakeCache file.
Cheers,
--
Szilárd
On Tue, Sep
The only way to know more is to either attach a debugger to the hanging
process or possibly with an ltrace/strace to see in which library or
syscalls is the process hanging.
I suggest you try attaching a debugger and getting a stack trace (see
https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Attach.html)
Hi,
I suggest you check some of our recent papers on the heterogeneous
parallelization.
Chapter two in the following (GROMACS 4.6-related) paper gives a good
overview of the (then) new parallelization aspects like threading and GPU
acceleration:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-
this list does not accept attachments. Please upload your file to some
file-sharing service and tell us the link.
Victot
2015-10-01 2:21 GMT-05:00 surbhi mahajan :
> Hi,
> I am trying to do simulations using lipids like DPPC and DMPC , i am not
> able to develop a coarse grained model nor am i
Have you tried the option "-pbc whole" instead of "-pbc mol"?
Victor
2015-10-01 6:43 GMT-05:00 gromacs query :
> Hi All,
>
> I have linear polymer in octahedron box and when I try to visualise a
> polymer in octahedraon box then water octahedron box looks as expected but
> my polymer looks broke
Dear Gromacs Users,I would like to use g_membed to insert my peptide into
membrane. But I got this errors and notes in grompp
ERROR 1 [file membed.mdp]:
Energy group exclusions are not (yet) implemented for the Verlet scheme
NOTE 4 [file membed.mdp]:
NVE simulation with an initial temperature
On 01/10/15 09:09, Raag Saluja wrote:
Hi!
A colleague of mine is having a little problem with the gromacs mailing
list. She says she subscribed to it, but when she posts, she gets no reply.
She does get the digest, however.
She asked me to ask you if you could kindly help her.
Have her go to
On 10/1/15 3:09 AM, Raag Saluja wrote:
Hi!
A colleague of mine is having a little problem with the gromacs mailing
list. She says she subscribed to it, but when she posts, she gets no reply.
She does get the digest, however.
She asked me to ask you if you could kindly help her.
Use the web
On 9/30/15 1:06 PM, Sepideh Kavousi wrote:
Hi,
In the force fiels that you use this atom in not introduced. you have to
import the information of atom in the atomtypes.atp file in the related
force field you use
The error is not at all related to the content of atomtypes.atp. The problem is
On 9/30/15 12:15 PM, Ebert Maximilian wrote:
Dear list,
I am trying to add n-number of molecules in my prepare protein+water+ions box
but keep a minimum distance of 1 nm in all directions between the newly
inserted molecules. On top of that I want to replace solvent molecules with the
newly
Hi All,
I have linear polymer in octahedron box and when I try to visualise a
polymer in octahedraon box then water octahedron box looks as expected but
my polymer looks broken.
trjconv_avx -f input.xtc -o out.xtc -pbc mol -ur compact -s input.tpr -b
10
I have tried to use -center (whole po
Dear GMX users
i want to compare binding free energy between experimental and MD
computations
In experimental methods, we assumed that all atoms of a protein that
binding to ligand, butin MD simulations, we just assume the sections of
subdomain(s) that binds to ligand
Is this way correct to compar
Hey,
If that doesn't do the trick use the flags suggested by Terry and also '-ur
compact'. This works for me.
Regards,
On 1 October 2015 at 02:49, Terry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Try options '-pbc mol -center' with the gmx trjconv tool.
>
> Terry
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:48 AM, 凌未风 wrote:
>
> >
Hi,
I am trying to do simulations using lipids like DPPC and DMPC , i am not
able to develop a coarse grained model nor am i able to understand the
purpose of the bead that i have got from SBCG model . Please help me in
analyzing this attachment. I am very new to this field. please help
Regards
Su
Hi!
A colleague of mine is having a little problem with the gromacs mailing
list. She says she subscribed to it, but when she posts, she gets no reply.
She does get the digest, however.
She asked me to ask you if you could kindly help her.
--
Regards,
Raag
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Plea
32 matches
Mail list logo