On 11/30/15 3:17 PM, Rakesh Ramachandran wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the reply. I have few more doubts. I had mentioned CHARMM27
just for consistency with Gromacs naming. In the website it mentions that
those settings are for CHARMM36 and I read at lot of places that this force
field is
On 12/1/15 8:11 AM, Ayesha Kanwal wrote:
Dear Bipin Singh,
i had read MDAnalysis but i could not get it to how make .trr file readable .
could you provide me an easy tutorial ? or number of steps to which i can
easily follow it and make .trr readable. or there is any source code which i
can
On 11/30/15 5:01 PM, 凌未风 wrote:
Hi All:
I pasted this once several days ago but no one replied. I know there are a lot
of questions in the forum regarding LINC warning, but my problem seems quite
strange. So I write here again.
My simulation system contains lipids and proteins, I am using
Dear Gromacs experts,
i am very new to Gromacs i only want to take .trr file and make it readable .
as i want to use .trr file in my own tool as an input format. how can i make it
readable and can use it in my tool ?
Best regards
Ayesha
--
Gromacs
On 12/1/15 6:39 AM, R Corey wrote:
Hello
I am running a series of FEP MD simulations using Gromacs 5.0.4, for each a
steepest descents minimization, NVT equil, NPT equil and production run,
all controlled by a central script. However, only about 50% of the runs get
through the NVT
On 12/1/15 7:38 AM, Marta Wisniewska wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
My problem focus on number order. I am preparing my system to md. In my pdb
file I made a some modifications (delete chains or ligand compounds).
During preparation of topology and gro file, the residue number ordering is
Dear Hannes,
> I have some trouble reading your top file in my web browser
Apologies, am not sure if this works in this list, but I am now also
attaching my topol.top and grompp.mdp files.
I hope this let's you see better what I am doing wrong.
> As your two dummy types appear to be identical
>
http://manual.gromacs.org/online/trr.html
Peter
-Original Message-
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
[mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of bipin
singh
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 2:48 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Dear Bipin Singh,
i had read MDAnalysis but i could not get it to how make .trr file readable .
could you provide me an easy tutorial ? or number of steps to which i can
easily follow it and make .trr readable. or there is any source code which i
can use for reading this file.
> Date: Tue, 1
Hello
I am running a series of FEP MD simulations using Gromacs 5.0.4, for each a
steepest descents minimization, NVT equil, NPT equil and production run,
all controlled by a central script. However, only about 50% of the runs get
through the NVT equilibration without crashing - crash error as
Dear Gromacs users,
My problem focus on number order. I am preparing my system to md. In my pdb
file I made a some modifications (delete chains or ligand compounds).
During preparation of topology and gro file, the residue number ordering is
changed. Is there any possibility to preserve number
On 12/1/15 2:04 AM, mah maz wrote:
Dear all,
I have some problems extracting data from traj.xtc. The command " g_traj -s
-ox" doesn't give reasonable coordinates. I tried "trjconv" but again
Why aren't they reasonable? That also couldn't have been your command, which
requires at least a
http://pythonhosted.org/MDAnalysis/documentation_pages/coordinates/TRR.html
--
Thanks and Regards,
Bipin Singh
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Ayesha Kanwal
wrote:
> Dear Gromacs experts,
> i am very new to Gromacs i only want to take
You still have couple-moltype set.
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:39:40 +0100
Sebastian Stolzenberg wrote:
> OK, thanks a lot, Hannes,
>
> I combined the "CL-" and "NA+" into one "NC" [moleculetype] and
> switched off the couple-* switches as you suggested (attached),
> but
OK, thanks a lot, Hannes,
I combined the "CL-" and "NA+" into one "NC" [moleculetype] and
switched off the couple-* switches as you suggested (attached),
but I am still receiving the same warning message:
"The lambda=0 and lambda=1 states for coupling are identical"
I guess I am almost there, am
Thank you Justin. I expected that only water molecules are written in .xtc
but all the others are there! g_traj -f traj.xtc -ox gives numbers like
1.64e-318 for all frames! How can I get real coordinates from .xtc?
Thanks!
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:34 AM, mah maz wrote:
>
Ok, my attachment seems to have been stripped, so inline only. Hope
it's not too bad.
[ atomtypes ]
;name bond_type mass charge ptype sigma
epsilon Amb
DU DU 0.0 0.0 A 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 ;
0.00 0.
OW OW 0.0 0.0
Dear Sebastian,
I have got your attachment. I do not know all intricacies of Gromacs
but for relative free energies you only use one moleculetype for the
perturbed group, see attachment. You do not use the couple-* switches
for relative simulations.
Yes, you are right about typeA and typeB.
A few things to check when trying to figure out the origin of the LINCS error
that occurs only after a long run:
1) What is your time step?
2) If you restart from a previous checkpoint does the same error occur?
3) What are your LINCS settings?
4) Do you see any unphysical behavior prior to the
19 matches
Mail list logo