Hi everyone,I'm trying to study on the damage of base by free hydroxyl
radicals using GROMACS-CPMD program. However, error occurred in optimization of
wave function. Would everyone tell me wheher the interface GMX and the OPTIMIZE
option cannot be used at the same time? if permitted, How
Hello experts,I ran a MD simulation on HPC where Gromacs-2016.4 installed on
GPU.I run the production simulation using job file and it terminated with the
fatal error: setting the number of thread-MPI ranks is only supported with
thread-MPI and Gromacs was compiled without thread-MPI. Please
Hello experts,I ran a MD simulation on HPC where Gromacs-2016.4 installed on
GPU.I run the production simulation using job file and it terminated with the
fatal error: setting the number of thread-MPI ranks is only supported with
thread-MPI and Gromacs was compiled without thread-MPI. Please
Hello GROMACS users,
I am using gromacs 2018.1
The manual and the gmx energy help page does not explicitly explain how the
"(surface tension) x (surface number)" is calculated. I assume it is
equation 3.69:
L_{z} ( P_{zz}(t) - ( 0.5*P_{xx}(t) + 0.5*P_{yy}(t) ) )
Has anyone implemented a tool
Hi all,
I had installed Gromacs 5.0.4 on a Centos6 system a few years ago, and
it was fine. We recently migrated our systems to Centos7, where Gromacs
2018 was installed, also without problems. A user requested the old
Gromacs 5.0.4 on the Centos7 system to complete a project.
I worked
I checked it for each window. it just oscillates just for 0.1nm in each
window and results are ok.
I just asked to realize your main purpose ...
And i'm convinced now ;) .
Thank you for your kindly and detailed answers like always.
Best regards
-Rose
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, 20:01 Justin Lemkul,
On 6/6/18 11:38 AM, Smith, Iris wrote:
Hi Dallas,
Thank you so much for your expedient response. I increased the radius from
0.375 to 0.600 however upon solvation, the water filled the hydrophobic core
again, albeit not as much as the initial solvation (at radius 0.375 added 6338
water
Hi Dallas,
Thank you so much for your expedient response. I increased the radius from
0.375 to 0.600 however upon solvation, the water filled the hydrophobic core
again, albeit not as much as the initial solvation (at radius 0.375 added 6338
water molecules; at radius 0.600 added 4672 water
On 6/6/18 11:18 AM, rose rahmani wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing umbrella sampling for different distances of amino acid from
surface.
I know that dear Justin warns people that position restraint was for that
specific situation in the article mentioned in tutorial and
I know it doesn't make a
On 6/6/18 11:13 AM, Eisenhart, Andrew (eisenhaw) wrote:
new link with sole mdp file
https://files.fm/u/cmyg863c
This system doesn't even survive energy minimization for me, suggesting
that the topology is not stable. The machine I'm on uses GROMACS 2016.3.
Please upgrade to at least that
Hi,
I'm doing umbrella sampling for different distances of amino acid from
surface.
I know that dear Justin warns people that position restraint was for that
specific situation in the article mentioned in tutorial and
I know it doesn't make a sense in my system too in PULLING. But i don't
new link with sole mdp file
https://files.fm/u/cmyg863c
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
on behalf of Justin Lemkul
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 9:30 PM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Virtual sites causing npt
Hello all,
I would like to perform a QM/MM simulation in gromacs, but when I run
grompp, it asks for the value of SAsteps. I searched online for the meaning
of this parameter and did not find anything. Can anyone please clarify what
is the meaning of SAsteps, please?
Thanks in advance and Best
On 6/6/18 5:47 AM, Apramita Chand wrote:
Dear All,
I want to choose a cutoff of 0.45nm and want to calculate the no. of urea
molecules within 0.45 as well as beyond 0.45nm of the peptide backbone(for
calculation of preferential interaction coefficient)
I have a total of 18 urea molecules in
On 6/6/18 2:12 AM, Muthukumaran Rajagopalan wrote:
thank you for the reply Justin.
though the APL looks close to the acceptable range, I am afraid the SN1 and SN2
acyl chain parameters are not in the range as reported by Pluhackova, K et al
J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 3888?3903 and also
Den 2018-06-06 kl. 11:43, skrev Apramita Chand:
Dear All,
I want to calculate the time-dependent autocorrelation function for a
peptide's end-to-end distance vector . If I use g_dist , it gives me a
dist.xvg but though -lt option is there, the lifetime.xvg file is not
generated.
Is there any
Dear All,
I want to choose a cutoff of 0.45nm and want to calculate the no. of urea
molecules within 0.45 as well as beyond 0.45nm of the peptide backbone(for
calculation of preferential interaction coefficient)
I have a total of 18 urea molecules in my system.
I have tried the g_trjorder command
Dear All,
I want to calculate the time-dependent autocorrelation function for a
peptide's end-to-end distance vector . If I use g_dist , it gives me a
dist.xvg but though -lt option is there, the lifetime.xvg file is not
generated.
Is there any command to calculate the autocorrelation function? (
I've tried to generate parameters for H2PO4 for Charmm in
https://cgenff.paramchem.org/ and the results were pretty OK (at least
in terms of penalties).
Best
Felipe
On 06/06/18 10:22, Ondrej Kroutil wrote:
Hi gromacs user,
I have a favour to ask you.
Does anybody have working model of
Hi gromacs user,
I have a favour to ask you.
Does anybody have working model of sulfuric acid and/or H2PO4- (exactly
these species with two OH groups)? I have tried to prepared one according
to various articles:
loukonen2010 - Enhancing effect of dimethylamine in sulfuric acid
nucleation in the
thank you for the reply Justin.
though the APL looks close to the acceptable range, I am afraid the SN1 and SN2
acyl chain parameters are not in the range as reported by Pluhackova, K et al
J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 3888?3903 and also the membrane thickness
increases.
>
>
>
>
>
Den 2018-06-06 kl. 05:01, skrev Debadutta Prusty:
Hi everyone,
I am new to gromacs and hence, this question might be naive. How does one
go about assigning charge groups while creating new monomer topologies in
.rtp files? What I gather from looking at similar posts is that the net
charge of a
22 matches
Mail list logo