I understand that transferring a system organized for namd-charmm36 ro
gromacs-charmm36 involves blind usage of transformation tools that are not
from gromacs. In the specific case, the tool became confused by the ligand
having a side chain with hyphened atom numbering, should the mismatch
between
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors?highlight=periodicity#System_has_non-zero_total_charge
On Fri, 30 Nov. 2018, 5:14 am Ali Khodayari <
ali.khoday...@student.kuleuven.be wrote:
> Dear gmx community,
>
>
>
> I am getting a note before performing the energy minimization step, from
>
Hi all,
We normally use TIP4P water for our work, but need to test TIP3P.
Everything is scripted, so I did minimal changes that hopefully follow
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/TIP3P_coordinate_file
In the topology, we are including tip3p.itp
In the run script, we are solvating with
Dear gromacs users
I'm simulation a hydrocarbon and water mixture placed on a slab of metal.
The metal surface is frozen in the z-direction. Energy minimization works
with no errors but I see the potential energy is too high as below.
Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 1754
Dear gmx community,
I am getting a note before performing the energy minimization step, from
grompp that "System has non-zero charge: -0.001135". The system is a
crystalline cellulose, built in Amber, using GLYCAM06 force field and the
topology and coordinate files have been converted to
Hi,
Hopefully early in 2019 we will get to the point where the mdp inputs are
expressed as key-value data structures, perhaps in JSON. Once we do that,
that aspect of the .tpr no longer needs to be binary, and dumping it is
trivial.
Mark
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:17 PM Thomas Piggot wrote:
>
Good to know, thanks!
Tom
On 29/11/2018 16:08, Paul bauer wrote:
Hello,
just a warning concerning the last message: The mdp from gmx dump -om
will not be the complete representation of your tpr, and you will not
be able to regenerate the tpr from this mdp file! I have been working
on a
Hello,
just a warning concerning the last message: The mdp from gmx dump -om
will not be the complete representation of your tpr, and you will not be
able to regenerate the tpr from this mdp file! I have been working on a
variant that would make this possible, but so far have not managed it.
You can get an mdp from a tpr using gmx dump -om
Cheers
Tom
On 29/11/2018 14:58, Peter Kroon wrote:
Hi all,
thanks for all the feedback.
@Milan: I've made a tally of diskspace used per filetype in our lab. In
general people here don't save trr files at all (too expensive), yet
still out of
Hi all,
thanks for all the feedback.
@Milan: I've made a tally of diskspace used per filetype in our lab. In
general people here don't save trr files at all (too expensive), yet
still out of 125TB total, 65% is made up of xtc files, and 10% is trr
files (followed by gro and xvg at 2.5% each).
Hi,
Yes, that's useful output, though strictly some mdp settings (like
constraints and gen-vel) are consumed by grompp and thus not reported there.
Mark
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 3:16 PM Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/18 6:43 AM, Peter Kroon wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > thanks for the rapid
Thanks for your reply sir. It's very useful input for me.
On Thu 29 Nov, 2018, 7:48 PM Justin Lemkul
>
> On 11/27/18 10:53 PM, Bratin Kumar Das wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > I have one pdb structure obtained from the solution NMR.
> It is
> > a peptide fragment. I want to stack it for
On 11/27/18 3:43 PM, Raji wrote:
Hi
Thank you for your reply. To parameterize the dihedrals, OSL-CL-NH1-H,
OSL-CL-NH1-CT1, NH1-CL-OSL-CTL2 (OSL,CL, CTL2 from carboxy benzyl capping
and NH1, H, CT1 from peptide backbone) How to segment the molecule with
peptide backbone?
The model compound
On 11/27/18 10:53 PM, Bratin Kumar Das wrote:
Dear all,
I have one pdb structure obtained from the solution NMR. It is
a peptide fragment. I want to stack it for studying aggression studies. How
I can do that. Any suggestions are highly appreciable.
Use editconf to manipulate
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 3:05 PM melichercik wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> may be the gmx dump -s *.tpr can help you a little with extracting
> starting data from .tpr file. You would get all interactions, positions
> and velocities of all atoms with their types, etc., but the data about
> aminoacid
On 11/29/18 6:43 AM, Peter Kroon wrote:
Hi Mark,
thanks for the rapid reply!
Hmmn. It doesn't have to be exactly matching input. An equivalent to
e.g. mdout.mdp produced by grompp would already be good enough for my
All of the input .mdp settings are also written to the header of the
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:43 PM Peter Kroon wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> thanks for the rapid reply!
>
> Hmmn. It doesn't have to be exactly matching input. An equivalent to
> e.g. mdout.mdp produced by grompp would already be good enough for my
> purposes. The same goes for a top file containing
Hi Peter,
may be the gmx dump -s *.tpr can help you a little with extracting
starting data from .tpr file. You would get all interactions, positions
and velocities of all atoms with their types, etc., but the data about
aminoacid sequence (well, all more complex informations that those
Hi,
As part of the BioExcel Center-of-Excellence for Biomolecular Simulation,
we have a new opening for somebody interested in joining the Gromacs team
in Stockholm to work specifically on training, use cases, creating
high-throughput workflows for simulations, and not least develop industrial
Hi Mark,
thanks for the rapid reply!
Hmmn. It doesn't have to be exactly matching input. An equivalent to
e.g. mdout.mdp produced by grompp would already be good enough for my
purposes. The same goes for a top file containing only the interactions
relevant to the system.
Peter
On 29-11-18
Your reply is very helpful to me.
Thank you Alex!
> -Original Messages-
> From: Alex
> Sent Time: 2018-11-29 16:59:20 (Thursday)
> To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: Re: Re: How to fix graphite layers?
>
>
> > My current plan is to divide the two atoms into
Hi,
Unfortunately there is no way to generate matching inputs to grompp from a
.tpr file. In the longer term, we want that to be possible, but it will
require a total rework of how users specify inputs, and that's a large
effort!
Mark
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:27 AM Peter Kroon wrote:
> Hi
Hi all,
In the lab we're thinking about backup solutions for MD data (and in
particular gromacs produced data). Since trajectories tend to be large
we quickly decided that backing up the results of simulations is a waste
of disk space. Instead, we'll probably go for backing up the TPR files.
My current plan is to divide the two atoms into two groups and set the
peripheral atoms to the frozen group in mdp file. I am not sure what the
interaction between the frozen and active groups is. If I need to generate top
files for each of these two groups, how should I tell the 'hot
Dear Alex:
Thank you very much for your reply.
I am sorry that I did not make my research background clear at first.
I want to explore the nature of the methane in organic pores in the formations
thousands meter underground.
In order to simplify the problem, graphite is used as a material for
I re-checked the initial configuration:
The interlayer distance is 0.34nm, which is consistent with other data
descriptions.
That is the interlayer distance that corresponds to the experimental
data for HOPG graphite. Whether it is compatible with the LJ parameters
of your carbons is a
26 matches
Mail list logo