Re: [gmx-users] Make errors 2019rc1

2018-12-14 Thread Raymond Arter
Paul, The CMake and system configuration are: OS:   Scientific Linux 6.6 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v2 @ 2.60GHz RAM: 32829272 kB python = 2.7.10 cuda = 9.2.148 gcc = 7.3.0 cmake = 3.9.0 binutils = 2.31 Nvidia driver version: 396.37 GPU: 4x Tesla K10.G2.8GB cmake ..

Re: [gmx-users] Make errors 2019rc1

2018-12-14 Thread Paul Bauer
Hello, Can you send your CMake command and system configuration? Cheers Paul On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, 18:27 Raymond Arter Hi, > > I'm seeing the following errors at the end of the make step: > > [100%] Linking CXX executable ../../bin/template > /opt/apps/general/binutils/2.31/bin/ld:

[gmx-users] Make errors 2019rc1

2018-12-14 Thread Raymond Arter
Hi, I'm seeing the following errors at the end of the make step: [100%] Linking CXX executable ../../bin/template /opt/apps/general/binutils/2.31/bin/ld: ../../lib/libgromacs.so.4.0.0: undefined reference to `gmx_fft_destroy(gmx_fft*)' /opt/apps/general/binutils/2.31/bin/ld:

[gmx-users] GROMACS 2019 release candidate

2018-12-14 Thread Paul bauer
Hi GROMACS users, The GROMACS 2019 release candidate is now out and available! As before, we are making the testing versions available for you to be able to get feedback on how well things are working, and what could be improved or if there are any bugs in the code we have missed ourselves.

Re: [gmx-users] connectivity issue

2018-12-14 Thread Fitsiou, Eleni
Hello, Just double check during the production phase too.You are welcome ! Παρακαλώ > On 14 Dec 2018, at 12:45, antonia vyrkou wrote: > > Hello Eleni, > > Thank you for your reply. I actually thought about that possibility after I > posted my problem and since I've triple checked my input

Re: [gmx-users] using dual CPU's

2018-12-14 Thread Kutzner, Carsten
> On 13. Dec 2018, at 22:31, pbusc...@q.com wrote: > > Carsten, > > A possible issue... > > I compiled gmx 18.3 with gcc-5 ( CUDA 9 seems to run normally ) Should > recompile with gcc-6.4 ? I don’t think that this will make a huge impact (but maybe you get a few extra percent performance)

Re: [gmx-users] connectivity issue

2018-12-14 Thread antonia vyrkou
Hello Eleni, Thank you for your reply. I actually thought about that possibility after I posted my problem and since I've triple checked my input files I assume that's what is going on. Thanks again! Ευχαριστώ! Best regards, Antonia On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM Fitsiou, Eleni wrote: > I

Re: [gmx-users] connectivity issue

2018-12-14 Thread Fitsiou, Eleni
I think it is probably a visualisation issue ..If the bond is not in the topology, then you are fine. VMD for example uses a criterion based on the distance to show the bonds. Best, Eleni > On 14 Dec 2018, at 11:12, antonia vyrkou wrote: > > Hello, > > I am a bit puzzled by the following

[gmx-users] connectivity issue

2018-12-14 Thread antonia vyrkou
Hello, I am a bit puzzled by the following problem After the energy minimization, in one type of molecules, appear two bonds that should not exist. If I visualize the pdb before the minimization everything is normal. After the minimization this problem appears. I checked the ffbonded.itp, the