[gmx-users] No default bond types

2020-03-24 Thread Neena Susan Eappen
Hello gromacs users, I just modified opls force field for a modified aminoacid with 4 new bond types and 9 new angle types. However, the command grompp gave a no default error for one bond and 6 angle types. Is there a way to resolve this? Many thanks and Take care, Neena -- Gromacs Users

[gmx-users] topology of co2

2020-03-24 Thread Afsane Farhadi
hi allI want to download a topology of co2  by opls as forcefield,  but many servers doesn't answer(like ligpargen and tppmktop). how can I find a topology for this molecule? Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at

[gmx-users] Drude polarization, practical matters

2020-03-24 Thread Nicolás Marcelo Rozas Castro
Hi everyone, I'll be straight, my questions are: 1. It is possible to use Drude model in GROMACS 5.1.5? 2. How exactly this is done? If someone had an input file example (pdb and/or itp) and can share it i'll appreciate. Thank a lot!! Nicolas Rozas Castro Universidad de Chile -- Gromacs Users

Re: [gmx-users] Various questions related to Gromacs performance tuning

2020-03-24 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, There could certainly be a bug with -ddorder pp_pme, as there's no testing done of that. If you can reproduce with a recent version of GROMACS, please do file a bug report. (Though this week we're moving to new infrastructure, so leave it for a day or two before trying to report it! Mark On

Re: [gmx-users] Various questions related to Gromacs performance tuning

2020-03-24 Thread Kutzner, Carsten
Hi, > Am 24.03.2020 um 16:28 schrieb Tobias Klöffel : > > Dear all, > I am very new to Gromacs so maybe some of my problems are very easy to fix:) > Currently I am trying to compile and benchmark gromacs on AMD rome cpus, the > benchmarks are taken from: >

Re: [gmx-users] Conversion of improper angles from amber object file to gromacs

2020-03-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/24/20 3:26 PM, Daniel Bauer wrote: Hi, I  am trying to convert forcefield parameters of zwitterionic glycine from an amber object file format to gromacs .rtp (to use it with amber99sb, which lacks zwitterionic amino acids). The amber library file I plan to use can be found here:

[gmx-users] Conversion of improper angles from amber object file to gromacs

2020-03-24 Thread Daniel Bauer
Hi, I  am trying to convert forcefield parameters of zwitterionic glycine from an amber object file format to gromacs .rtp (to use it with amber99sb, which lacks zwitterionic amino acids). The amber library file I plan to use can be found here:

[gmx-users] GROMACS has switched to use Gitlab

2020-03-24 Thread Paul bauer
Hello gmx users! I just finished the transition of our project database to use the Gitlab servers. This means that from now on issues should be reported using the issue tracker at https://gitlab.com/gromacs/gromacs/-/issues instead of redmine.gromacs.org. The redmine and gerrit servers have

[gmx-users] Various questions related to Gromacs performance tuning

2020-03-24 Thread Tobias Klöffel
Dear all, I am very new to Gromacs so maybe some of my problems are very easy to fix:) Currently I am trying to compile and benchmark gromacs on AMD rome cpus, the benchmarks are taken from: https://www.mpibpc.mpg.de/grubmueller/bench 1) OpenMP parallelization: Is it done via OpenMP tasks? If

[gmx-users] Lincs warning in free energy calculation

2020-03-24 Thread Sadaf Rani
Dear Gromacs users I ran an MD simulation for 3ns and from the last coordinates started a free energy calculation for 3ns. My system is well equilibrated but after 710725 steps I am getting Lincs warning every time as below:- WARNING: There are no atom pairs for dispersion correction starting

Re: [gmx-users] Parrinello-Rahman and Pairtype1 causing pressure instabilities

2020-03-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/24/20 3:09 AM, Wesley Michaels wrote: Hi, Thanks for your reply! I built the topology with my own script, as opposed to using pdb2gmx. Following Bogdan's instructions here ( https://mailman-1.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/2012-December/077005.html), I specified all

[gmx-users] Free energy change calculation

2020-03-24 Thread Xiaotong Zhang
Hi, Sorry to bother you. Recently, I have encountered a problem when running free energy calculation of a dna-ligand complex system. The structure start to getting weird when I try to specify the two state (A,B) in the topology file, which is never spotted in the unconstrained MD simulations.

Re: [gmx-users] Parrinello-Rahman and Pairtype1 causing pressure instabilities

2020-03-24 Thread Wesley Michaels
Hi, Thanks for your reply! I built the topology with my own script, as opposed to using pdb2gmx. Following Bogdan's instructions here ( https://mailman-1.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/2012-December/077005.html), I specified all instances of 1-4 pair interactions (i.e. pairs of atom