Hi All,
Today I compiled GROMACS 5.1.2 on two machines. One has i7-3770k, the other
one has i7-4770k. The odd thing I saw was it took 264.77 sec to complete
the regression tests on the 4770k machine while it took 150.05 sec on the
3770k machine. The specs of the 3770k machine are lower in all
Hi Tsjerk,
I replicated their settings in their papers. The system size I used is
larger than what they had. Could you elaborate on the reference used for
fitting? Thank you so much.
Cheers,
Bin
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:29:26 +0100
From: Tsjerk Wassenaar
To:
rset=UTF-8
Hi Bin,
The procedure is correct, provided you ensured that the input trajectory
did not have PBC jumps. But the paper you refer to is on dihedral angle
PCA...
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Jan 7, 2016 23:06, "Bin Liu" <fdusuperstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
Hi All,
I am trying to reproduce the Cartesian PCA results for ALA3 in water by
Altis et al. (Fig.2 of Dihedral angle principal component analysis of
molecular dynamics simulations. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2746330 )
It is probably the most well-known PCA analysis results. I created a system
Dear Teemu,
Thank you for your explanation. Now I understand why the first selection
gives more residues as it's simply a superset of the second selection. I
just realized to accomplish what I initially want, i.e., to obtain the
residue index list of LIPID whose center of mass is within 1.0 nm of
Hi Everyone,
I am recently puzzled by the syntax and behaviour of g_select. I want to
obtain the residue index list of LIPID whose center of mass is within 1.0
nm of the surface of protein. In my case, each LIPID molecule consists of
only one residue. I wrote the selection.dat as follows, and set
-5.0_bin ~/gromacs_bin
If you're in a unix shell, you need to re-open it for .bashrc to take
effect.
I assumed you're running GROMACS under some Linux/Unix platform
but probably the same can be achieved on any other OS.
Hope this helps,
t
On 2 Aug 2014 00:32, Bin Liu fdusuperstr
Hi Everyone,
I have a question about the implementation details of g_order. When I was
reading literatures, I found several interpretations of how the deuterium
order parameters are computed. One is calculate S_{ij} first, then
S_{CD} = \frac{2}{3} S_{xx} + \frac{1}{3} S_{yy}.
Another approach