My advise is a bit general.
Try the same process with a different molecule (one that can support this
change), try the same molecule with an AA ff, since it is already done (as you
mentioned) do you get similar results?
These tests might help you find out if there is something wrong with your
In most cases this means that the exact same line is given more than once. I
would start from there.
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
on behalf of Adarsh V. K.
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 1:26 PM
To:
Did you try a script that calls gmx energy in each iteration, parsing the index
of each atom as an input???
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
on behalf of zk_dlut
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 10:49:25 AM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
ur index.ndx for better investigation.
On Monday, August 21, 2017, 9:24:35 PM GMT+3, Sotirios Dionysios I. Papadatos
<si.papada...@edu.cut.ac.cy> wrote:
Hi, I am trying to calculate the distance between two atoms, which are defined
in an index file. The command that I use is:
"gmx di
Hi, I am trying to calculate the distance between two atoms, which are defined
in an index file. The command that I use is:
"gmx distance -f output.gro -s prod.tpr -n index.ndx -oav distance.xvg"
I get the obvious:
"Selection 'atom_name' does not evaluate into an even number of positions
Hi, to get things straight did you use pdb2gmx or just editconf? Where does the
error occur?
My personal choice is Maestro which is free for academic use. The resulting
pdbs' have no problem with Gromacs.
If you want to make minor changes, for example change LIG to DRG (assuming DRG
is
Sorry for being late and I hope you already found it yourself, but in any case
here goes, in tc-grps you use one system HEM, while right below you enter
params for two tau-t = 0.1(1) 0.2(2). Although I don't know what you want to
simulate but in general you use: Protein(protein + ligands)
automated builders usually produce these mistakes. I see that you already
checked which atoms correspond to this error. Check first if there is an actual
bond there. If it is check ffbonded if these atom types are parametrized.
From:
Furthermore external servers fail to parameterize Fe, so it is of no use
anyway. You should find the missing parameters in the literature.
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
on behalf of
OK, dividing the number by 3 could be used if you are using a 3-point water
solvent. Apart from that, assuming that during the procedure up to minimization
you didn't forget to update your topology file, this usually comes up if you
manually edit your .gro, .top files. Check your .gro file, top
Hi and sorry for being late. My suggestion is a bit off, but wouldn't it be
better/easier to work in an existent HPC center? More efficient and less hustle
setting up the system. The one my research group uses is:
http://web.cytera.cyi.ac.cy/about/
Hope this helps
In pdb2gmx you give as an input the filename.pdb. This should do the trick. But
I think there is something else that you truly need. Maybe you need some more
info on how to add a hetatm in an existing force field.?
From:
Maybe you are trying to simulate a molecule that is not mentioned in the
aminoacids.rtp on the force field of your choice or more probably the atom that
is mentioned on the error report has a different name than the the one provided
on the pdb file.
My advice is to check on the ff directory >
Hi, even if this is not the place for Desmond, your institute has most probably
provided you with an email. You can register on their website and download the
software for free using an academic (free) license.
From:
For this I would suggest the following. From your structure remove any ligands
and then run pdb2gmx. Open the parameter file and the original file with a
visualization tool. Find a carbon from any aminoacid that has a double bond.
Check for its name in the force field directory, there you will
Hi, run some diagnostics, don't use the -xyinit etc
Try the basics gmx g_membed -f -p ... etc
Also the way this worked for me was to use an index file. I made an index of
the prot + lig + crystallographic waters and I used it in both grompp and
g_membed. In the latter I just used the
group
eers
Mohsen
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Sotirios Dionysios I. Papadatos <
si.papada...@edu.cut.ac.cy> wrote:
> I am not aware on your question per se, but just to give you food for
> thought. Force fields are not based on real values of let's say force
> constants.
I am not aware on your question per se, but just to give you food for thought.
Force fields are not based on real values of let's say force constants. You
can't produce for example 'plasma' at least with the default ff, if you
overheat. So it not a matter of a ff not being accurate for high
Maybe your residue has an atom name that is not defined as AMBER 03 ff expects
it to. Check the f directory to see how TYR has the atom names defined.
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
on
I might be wrong here, but energy is supposed to converge. Maybe you want to
verify something else?
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
on behalf of Tsjerk
Wassenaar
Hi, in my case gmx is only needed for certain commands. For example pdb2gmx is
working if I use it solo, not with gmx. It's worth a shot.
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
on
Hi, in general the error is self explanatory. It means that you have set more
atoms in the topology file (usually that is the case).
I would suggest a simple script in the language that you are most comfortable
with, to count the occurrences of a specific element.
Hope this helps.
I am trying to change the orientation of a protein embedded in a protein. I am
using the command editconf -rotate. The output is only the protein without the
membrane. My question is if there is a way to do a rotation of the protein in
regard to the membrane (I am using an index file). Thanks
Hi, though your system is not that small, you shouldn't have any problem
running lysozyme tutorial. Although the number of CPU's only affect the ns/day
a simulation runs, it is a matter of your HPC system. Did you install gromacs
yourself??
From:
In maestro export project > (save_as) atomName.pdb
Just another way to avoid using another program
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
on behalf of Smith,
Micholas D.
M
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] mdp file
On 9/1/15 12:50 PM, Sotirios Dionysios I. Papadatos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some trouble defining a proper mdp file for minimization and
> production runs. I am aware of the manual's - site's reference to this
> matter, it
Hi,
I am having some trouble defining a proper mdp file for minimization and
production runs. I am aware of the manual's - site's reference to this matter,
it is pretty thourough.
My question is: How do I know which parameters to use for each simulation? Is
there a publication, book etc to
This is most probably due to some missing atoms. If you are not trying to
include exotic atoms, meaning that you have to add them to aminoacids.rtp etc
then you need a program like Schrodinger/maestro to manually add the atoms
missing, export it to .pdb and try again.
Hope that helps
If I got it right I would suggest this. Try removing parts in your overall
structure.
For example let's say your system has 3 components water, ATP, TPO. Try
removing all but water, try pdb2gmx, all but ATP ( like a sim in vacuo ) try
once again pdb2gmx. This will make the troubled part
constraint implementations - see the manual
section headed constraint algorithms.
Mark
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:39 AM Sotirios Dionysios I. Papadatos
si.papada...@edu.cut.ac.cy wrote:
Dear community,
I am trying to set parameters for a molecule that doesn't exist in gromacs
library.
I have
Dear community,
I am trying to set parameters for a molecule that doesn't exist in gromacs
library.
I have found all the required data from the literature, apart from bond force
constant (Kb).
There seems to be a way to overcome this but using constraints on all the bonds
using the Settle
If I am not mistaken, and there is a chance that I am the length and force
constant are used with grompp in ffbonded.itp in the force field directory.
After the question mark everything else is indeed not read so it is mostly used
by the users for clarification. But I believe that in the part
Hi, I'm not accustomed with coarse grained, but from the little stuff I know on
MD in order to keep a box's size constant you have to use an NVT simulation not
an NPT. Meaning don't keep pressure constant but rather the volume. Do double
check though, I might be wrong.
...@maillist.sys.kth.se
[gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] on behalf of Justin Lemkul
[jalem...@vt.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:34 PM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Error using grompp - atomtype not found
On 5/25/15 11:08 AM, Sotirios Dionysios I. Papadatos
Hi,
I have made a molecule.itp, which is what I want to run MD calculations on.
Meaning I couldn't produce it with pdb2gmx but I rather made a .top with vi
editor.
When I try to use grompp it says atomtype opls_ not found.
I have added all the needed atoms in atomtypes.atp of the ff I
Hi,
I have made a molecule.itp file according to the chapter 5 of Gromacs Manual
and existing entries in the ff directory I want to use.
My problem is that I don't know how to continue, in theory I have to include it
in the .top file but a .top file is produced by pdb2gmx which I cannot use
Hi,
This indeed begins to clarify things but just to make sure I got it right.
I want to simulate only a specific molecule from a protein, meaning I took the
initial protein and deleted everything but the molecule.
So I use the pdb2gmx to the molecule, I edit the topol.top that is produced
37 matches
Mail list logo