totally different secondary structures that's why I
was worrying.. because these are major structures one reports so Very
important to resolve this issue.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2020, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 1/13/20 9:15 AM, Sundari wrote:
>
>> Yes, Sir, I made the gro fil
sp shows
8 residues making beta-sheets but when I load that particular time frame in
vmd for visualizing the structure, these 8 residues showing 5-helix
structure.
Please suggest something.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:01 PM Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 1/13/20 7:22 AM, Sundari wr
s any way to animate secondary structure in vmd according to dssp
algorithm.
Best regards,
Sundari
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:37 PM Alessandra Villa <
alessandra.villa.bio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> VMD and dssp may use a slightly different criteria to define a beta
> sheet.
Dear Gromacs Users,
I have a big query regarding the "do_dssp" tool of gromacs-5.1.2.
Whenever I calculate the protein secondary structure by "gmx do_dssp" , it
shows a significant amount of beta sheet structures. But when I load the
same trajectory file in VMD for visualization of the secondary
Dear Gromacs users,
Can anyone explain about -nmol (number of molecules ) option in gmx gyrate
tool. According to me I have 3 peptide chains in my simulation box and I am
using " -nmol 3".
Is it correct what I have used for this option?
Regards
Sundari
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
idea.
sundari
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 8:47 PM rose rahmani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can calculate adsorption energy by umbrella sampling.
> http://www.mdtutorials.com/gmx/umbrella/index.html
> .edr just gives you the interaction energy not adsorption energy and
> distance.
>
&
can get these binding energies.
Regards,
Sundari
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https
Dear Gromacs users,
I want to calculate Binding energy between the protein and the carbon nano
tube. Is there any way to do that by gromacs commands.
As I only have .xtc and .tpr files from gromacs.
Please suggest me any idea or any article so that based on trajectories
(xtc or trr) how one
Kindly look at my query..
Thank you!
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Sundari wrote:
> Dear gromacs users,
>
> I am running a simulation of three alpha helical peptides with a carbon
> nano tube in a simulation box. Actually I am following a paper and want to
> reproduce the res
Dear gromacs users,
I am running a simulation of three alpha helical peptides with a carbon
nano tube in a simulation box. Actually I am following a paper and want to
reproduce the results.
In my simulation every time there is a sudden increase of 5-helix count,
means most of the alpha helix
Hello Guys,
Kindly suggest me something about my doubt.
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Sundari <sundi6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got the continuous trajectories by using demux. But now I am confused in
> getting potential energy distribution of a single repli
x script.
>
> Mark
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:28 PM Sundari <sundi6...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear gromacs users,
> >
> > can anyone please suggest me that how we get the time evolution of a
> > replica (say replica_1) in temperature space and time course
replica_index.xvg and replica_temp.xvg. But I want to analyse a single
replica trajectory in all temperatures ( temp. on y-axis)
Thank you in advance..
Sundari
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting
Thanks a lot ...
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/18/18 6:05 AM, Sundari wrote:
>
>> Thank You :)
>>
>> I have a little doubt now. If I want total percentage of all 8 secondary
>> structures separatel
dues in a given secondary structure as a function of time. From that,
> percentage over time is a trivial scripting task, [(# in SS) / (# of
> residues)]*100.
>
> -Justin
>
> Regards,
>>
>> S. Borkotoky
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Sundari
my problem resolved :)
Thank you
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Sundari <sundi6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear gromacs users,
>
> can any one please tell me that how we get the secondary structure
> propensity or secondary structure content(%) as a function of simulation
>
Dear gromacs users,
can any one please tell me that how we get the secondary structure
propensity or secondary structure content(%) as a function of simulation
time.
I used "gmx do_dssp" but it gives me number of residues forming the
secondary structure vs simulation time. is it same thing or
Dear gromacs users,
can any one please tell me that how we get the secondary structure
propensity or secondary structure content(%) as a function of simulation
time.
I used "gmx do_dssp" but it gives me number of residues forming the
secondary structure vs simulation time. is it same thing or
Dear all
I have plotted the Free Energy Landscapes(2D) of proteins from First two
principal
components as used by GROMACS, But after that I am confused how to do
clustering on PCA surface or I want to know how to calculate the structure
of protein
corresponding to lowest free energy in FELs.
Is
Dear all,
I am doing a protein simulation. After NVT equilibration, I tried to do NPT
but everytime I got this error :-
---
Program gmx grompp, VERSION 5.1.2
Source code file:
residues, from
>>> which computing percentage is trivial based on the number of total
>>> residues.
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>> Hope that makes sense.
>>>
>>>> ===
>>>> Micholas Dean Smith, PhD.
>
Dear all,
I am confused with 'dssp' output graph i.e "number of residues vs time". Is
it also called "secondary structure content(%) vs time" ?? Or it is
different term?
please, anyone help me to solve this confusion or send me any link
contained proper definition of these two.
Thanks in
If anyone have Idea.
kindly suggest.
On Wednesday, June 28, 2017, Sundari <sundi6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used the following command..
> gmx mindist -f ../traj_comp3.xtc -s ../md3.tpr -n index.ndx -od
> minidist.xvg -on numb_count -d 0.65
> By doing this I
FROc2s
here, output is a size.xvg file which is looking something feasible. I am
not sure is that output contains number of inter peptide contacts which I
needed or this is something else as the name suggested "size.xvg". Please
clear my confusion.
Thank you!
Sundari
On Wed, Jun 28,
but
i got wrong results.
Please suggest me right command line to do this analysis.
Thank you!
Sundari
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support
25 matches
Mail list logo