Hello Gromacs Users,
I would like to know how to run the simulation on a cluster. I have cluster
in my lab with 6 nodes having 16 cpus and 4 nodes having 8 cpus. What
command do I have to use all the nodes? How do I know whether cpus from all
nodes are being used??
Thanks in advance for help
--
Dear Gromacs Users,
I have been trying to simulate a docked complex of cellobiohydrolase with
cellotriose for the past 1 week. I have derived the parameters of
ellotriose from ATB server and with these parameters I am getting LINCS
warning at the nvt equilibration step, which I assume is due to
Hi,
I have been trying to build the toplogy for cellopentoase using the newly
derived parameters mentioned in this paper:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21387332. I got the paper from the
gromacs website:
http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/200/=56a_CARBO4GROMACS.rar
When I try to
Dear Gromacs Users,
I am interested to know how to create a separate topology file for the QM
atoms of a system. It would be of great help if somebody can explain this.
For my QM system, I need to include the active site residues + ligand.
--
*Best Regards*
BM
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
*
Dear Gmx Users,
I am trying to run a QM-MM optimization using ORCA and Gromacs 5.1.2
version. I complied gromacs 5.1.2 with ORCA as QM-MM program. Here's the
output of CMakeCache.txt file for QM package:
//QM package for QM/MM. Pick one of: none, gaussian, mopac, gamess,
// orca
grps= Protein_AS_5YWR
> QMmethod = am1
> QMMMscheme = normal
> QMbasis = sto-3g
> QMcharge = 0
> QMmult = 1
>
>
>
> the QM parameters were copied from a tutorial (
= sto-3g
QMcharge = 0
QMmult = 1
the QM parameters were copied from a tutorial (
http://www.dddc.ac.cn/embo04/practicals/qmmm/qmmmvacuum.html) to test the
trial run. I am using ORCA for QMMM calculations. Could you please let me
know how to rectify these erro
Dear GMX Users,
I am trying to perform QM/MM simulation for my system and I need to define
LA for the boundary between QM and MM region. I have the boundary regions
but I don't know how to add them in the gro file. Do I have to manually
modify the .gro file, if that's the case, adding, them
Dear Gmx Users,
I am interested in calculating cremer-pople parameters for a trisachharide
ligand from its simulation docked with a protein. I found one tool
g_puckering for calculating the parameters but it was written for Gromacs
version 4.0.x and I am using version 5.0.4. I am not able to
ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD_content=001>
> | More info
> <http://blog.boxbe.com/general/boxbe-automatic-cleanup?tc_serial=25130947906_rand=499504373_source=stf_medium=email_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD_content=001>
>
>
>
> On 4/19/16 9:22 PM, bharat gupta wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr
command `gmx make_ndx -f
> xxx.gro`, that's because you have not created one for it. Consult the
> manual for how to use make_ndx.
>
> Terry
>
Thanks Terry. I already discussed with Justin about this problem and now I
know where I was going wrong..
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/19/16 9:08 PM, bharat gupta wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 4/19/16 9:01 PM,
875792_source=stf_medium=email_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD_content=001>
> | More info
> <http://blog.boxbe.com/general/boxbe-automatic-cleanup?tc_serial=25130648872_rand=1182875792_source=stf_medium=email_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD_content=001>
>
>
>
> On 4/19/16 8:28 PM, bharat
4/19/16 9:03 AM, bharat gupta wrote:
>
>> Dear Gmx users,
>>
>> I am performing a protein-ligand simulation using gromacs latest tutorial
>> for 5.0.x version. As per the tutorial, I included the coordinates of the
>> ligand in the complex.gro file (also updated
Dear Gmx users,
I am performing a protein-ligand simulation using gromacs latest tutorial
for 5.0.x version. As per the tutorial, I included the coordinates of the
ligand in the complex.gro file (also updated total no. of atoms after
adding ligand atoms) and updated the topology file (topol.top)
Dear Gmx users,
I am performing a protein-ligand simulation using gromacs latest tutorial
for 5.0.x version. As per the tutorial, I included the coordinates of the
ligand in the complex.gro file (also updated total no. of atoms after
adding ligand atoms) and updated the topology file (topol.top)
Hi,
My simulation stopped because of power outage and I restarted it using the
command:
mpirun -np 32 mdrun_mpi -cpi mdrun.cpt -s mdrun.cpt
It shows correctly the restarting time point, however the mdrun.log is not
getting updated and I don't know how to verify whether the simulation is
being
Hi,
I want to make an index file for a certain residue, say residue 14 and its
atom CA. I can eaily do that if its a single chain protein, but my protein
contains 10 chains and I don't know how to select residue 14 from each
chain. I tried splitting the protein into chains by using splitch
, November 5, 2014, bharat gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I want to make an index file for a certain residue, say residue 14 and
its
atom CA. I can eaily do that if its a single chain protein, but my
protein
contains 10 chains and I don't know how to select residue 14 from
Hello,
Can you index your residues so that each residue gets a unique number.
pdb2gmx has an option -renum that will do this for you.
Best,
Eric
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:33 PM, bharat gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for your response. But in the gro file
Thanks ..
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:28 PM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
You need to perform the NVT and NPT equilibration at 353.1 K and then use
your equilibrated system for the production run.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:55 AM, bharat gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.com
Hi,
I first simulated my protein system at 300 K. Now I want to simulate the
same protein system at high temperature (353.15 K). So, do I need to
perform the npt and nvt equilibration again at 353.1 K first and then the
final production run ?? Will it be okay to change the temp only in the
Hi,
I want to know the default cutoff distance g_saltbr tool uses in
identifying the salt-bridges..
Regards
--
Bharat
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
Hi,
I extended a crashed simulation using the command :
mpirun -np 24 mdrun -v -s mdrun.tpr -cpi mdrun.cpt
I just stopped the restarted simulation after some time and found that
mdrun.log was not updated, because log file and results obtained from
gmxcheck are different.
Here's the last
Hi,
While issuing the command g_kinetics, I got an error saying that the
program should be complied with GNU scientific library. Please install the
library and reinstall Gromacs. Is there an option where I can compile only
this tool, as rest of the other gromacs tools are working fine.
Regards
compile this tool, but you still need to configure a new
GROMACS build to use libgsl before make g_kinetics can be useful.
Mark
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:17 AM, bharat gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
While issuing the command g_kinetics, I got an error saying that the
program
like a bug. What GROMACS command and version produced it?
Mark
On May 29, 2014 6:40 AM, bharat gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks you all for your responses. As far the chain name is concerned,
that
can be worked out by a simple script. But I found another issue in the
converted
wrote:
It seems like you've generated a structure that does not match the
preconceptions of PyMol. What is there to solve?
Mark
On May 29, 2014 8:09 AM, bharat gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry, it was my mistake actually i opened this file in excel that's
why I
Hi,
I energy minimized a protein consisting 10 chains using gromacs. When I
converted the structure of the protein from gro format to pdb format to
visualize in Pymol, it shows only one chain in ribbon form and rest of the
chains are not shown ... How to rectify this error ??
Regards
-
okay ,... thanks
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 5/28/14, 9:36 PM, bharat gupta wrote:
I am not concerned about secondary structure changes. But I want to
visualize the entire protein structure in ribbon form after energy
minimization... When I
.
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of bharat
gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.com
Sent: 28 May 2014 21:36
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users
-cleanup?tc_serial=17411327790tc_rand=1534107469utm_source=stfutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADDutm_content=001
On 5/28/14, 10:04 PM, bharat gupta wrote:
Here's the details of my topol.top file:
#include topol_Protein_chain_A.itp
#include topol_Protein_chain_B.itp
#include
...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of bharat
gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.com
Sent: 28 May 2014 21:24
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Secondary structure not visible after converting
from .gro to .pdb
Hi,
I energy minimized a protein consisting 10 chains using
Hi,
I have some small doubt regarding using urea in simulation. Actually, I
calculated the the number of urea molecules for a particular concentration
in the box. For eg., the same box if filled with water occupies 43614
molecules of water and if I need to fill molecules of urea for 1M
Hi,
I have posted this query two times in the forum, but got no reply. Can
anybody give an advice on the following question ...
I am trying to apply the REMD to study the difference between the folding
free energy of a 24 residue peptide with two different conformations. As I
am short of
Dear GMX Users,
I am trying to apply the REMD to study the difference between the folding
free energy of a 24 residue peptide with two different conformations. As I
am short of required number of processors for REMD in explicit water, I am
trying my luck with implicit solvent. I have come across
Dear Vidya sankar,
I think this may help you with the REMD. Here's the link for the tutorial:
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Tutorials/GROMACS_USA_Workshop_and_Conference_2013/An_introduction_to_replica_exchange_simulations%3a_Mark_Abraham%2c_Session_1B
This tutorial deals with REMD and
If you have done the same mistake what I did, then you should get two files
with names traj.xtc and traj.trr. These files contains the results for the
restarted simulation. You can use trjconv to concatenate the new
(traj.xtc)+ previous(old.xtc) files. I hope this should work for you...
On Mon,
Hi,
I want to perform the dihedral PCA for two residues of a turn region in a
protein i.e 4 dihedral angles. I have created an index file for the atoms
constituting phi and psi angles for those two residues. But I don't
understand what has to be written in covar file .. According to manual it
39 matches
Mail list logo