Dear Gromacs community,
I am attemping to use Gromacs for a Coarse - grained simulation. In our
model, we have a term similar to the angle harmonic potential term, but the
variable is not angle but the volume created by three consecutive vectors.
I don't know if there is a way to implement that
Dear Gromacs community,
In the [ atomtypes ] directive, according to Gromacs manual, it should have
7 seperated fields, which are name, at.num, mass, charge, ptype, c6, c12.
However, when I remove the field of at.num, Gromacs still works without
notifying any error. If I insert 2 fields more, it
Dear Gromacs community,
In the Gromacs manual, if nrexcl = 3, that means atoms i+1, i+2, i+3 are
excluded from non-bonded interactions with atom i. I don't know how Gromacs
determine the neighboring atoms, based on atom indices or bond connections?
For example, if I have a simple connection
Hi all,
I am reading the paper "Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for
protein folding" by Yuko Okamoto. In this paper, they exchange temperatures
of 2 replica. To evaluate that replica exchange is successful, they
calculate exchange probability; plot the temperature, potential energy per
*Dear Gromacs society,*
*I don't know how Gromacs define and calculate the multiplicity and
equilibrium dihedral angle? For example, in Amber, the multiplicity is 1
and -3 but in Gromacs it is 1 and 3; All phi0 values in gromacs are
positive but they are negative in Amber.*
*Thank you very much
Thank you,
Best,
*Lan Hoa*
2017-06-15 17:02 GMT-05:00 Mark Abraham <mark.j.abra...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Those are simply fields separated by whitespace. Columns not relevant.
>
> Mark
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:10 lan hoa Trinh <trinhlan...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Gromacs society,
I wonder if there is the default for the space between the columns in the
topology file, for example:
[ bonds ]
;ai aj funcr0(nm) Kb
12 1 3.805916447e-01 2.0e+04
23 1 3.788218579e-01 2.0e+04
3
awesome :) Thank you!
*Lan Hoa*
2017-04-23 20:15 GMT-05:00 Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>:
>
>
> On 4/22/17 10:39 PM, lan hoa Trinh wrote:
>
>> Dear Justin,
>> I am assessing based on a time series. You are right :), even I used the
>> same topology file, t
ngle
point, it is not true when we try to simulate over a period of time and
what we can trust is the the average value.
Hum, do I understand wrongly again, hixx.
Best regards,
*Lan Hoa*
2017-04-22 20:41 GMT-05:00 Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>:
>
>
> On 4/22/17 9:06 PM,
Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>:
>
>
> On 4/20/17 4:37 PM, lan hoa Trinh wrote:
>
>> Dear Mark,
>> I equilibrated my system in NVT, and then plot the potential energy.
>> However the potential energy created with the two topology is not match.
>> Thanks in
e you assessing "different?"
>
> Mark
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:13 lan hoa Trinh <trinhlan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> > I am modelling a system of spherical beads (which I named as Fi) which
> only
> > repulsive each other. I would h
Dear All,
I am modelling a system of spherical beads (which I named as Fi) which only
repulsive each other. I would highly appreciate if some one can have a look
at the following topology which I created:
(ficoll1.top)
[ defaults ]
;nbfunc comb-rule gen-pairs
1 1 no
[
Dear Gromacs community,
I am using Gromacs to simulate a C-alpha structure and have the following
topology file (created by http://smog-server.org/).
[ defaults ]
;nbfunc comb-rule gen-pairs
1 1 no
[ atomtypes ]
;name mass charge ptype c10 c12
CA 1.000
13 matches
Mail list logo