Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 2019 - Ryzen Architecture

2020-01-09 Thread Szilárd Páll
Good catch Kevin, that is likely an issue -- at least part of it. Note that you can also use the mdrun -multidir functionality to avoid having to manually manage mdrun process placement and pinning. Another aspect is that if you leave half of the CPU cores unused, the cores in use can boost to a

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 2019 - Ryzen Architecture

2020-01-04 Thread Kevin Boyd
Hi, A few things besides any Ryzen-specific issues. First, your pinoffset for the second one should be 16, not 17. The way yours is set up, you're running on cores 0-15, then Gromacs will detect that your second simulation parameters are invalid (because from cores 17-32, core 32 does not exist)

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 2019 - Ryzen Architecture

2020-01-02 Thread Paul bauer
Hello, we only added full detection and support for the newer Rizen chip-sets with GROMACS 2019.5, so please try if the update to this version solves your issue. If not, please open an issue on redmine.gromacs.org so we can track the problem and try to solve it. Cheers Paul On 02/01/2020

[gmx-users] Gromacs 2019 - Ryzen Architecture

2020-01-02 Thread Sandro Wrzalek
Hi, happy new year! Now to my problem: I use Gromacs 2019.3 and to try to run some simulations (roughly 30k atoms per system) on my PC which has the following configuration: CPU: Ryzen 3950X (overclocked to 4.1 GHz) GPU #1: Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti GPU #2: Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti RAM: 64 GB PSU: