Thank you Justin for your help.
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 6:38 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 3/9/16 1:42 AM, mohammad r wrote:
> Thank you Parham and Justin, Excuse me I have another question, in simulation
> of a water-peptide system, is it necessary to use QM/MM
On 3/9/16 1:42 AM, mohammad r wrote:
Thank you Parham and Justin, Excuse me I have another question, in simulation
of a water-peptide system, is it necessary to use QM/MM simulation during the
entire process? Because I didn't see it in the tutorials. By the way I
generated the pdb file by
Thank you Parham and Justin,
Excuse me I have another question, in simulation of a water-peptide system, is
it necessary to use QM/MM simulation during the entire process? Because I
didn't see it in the tutorials. By the way I generated the pdb file by using
charmm-gui then import it in amber
On 3/8/16 3:59 AM, mohammad r wrote:
Thank you Parham
You mean that it is not necessary to do QM/MM simulation?
The trivial task of adding ions to neutralize the net charge on the system
certainly does not require anything like QM/MM.
-Justin
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 11:13 AM,
Thank you Parham
You mean that it is not necessary to do QM/MM simulation?
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 11:13 AM, Parham Jabbarzadeh (Department of
Biomedical Science) wrote:
Dear Sir
Use this command:
gmx genion -s ions.tpr -o solv_ions.gro -p topol.top -neutral
Dear Sir
Use this command:
gmx genion -s ions.tpr -o solv_ions.gro -p topol.top -neutral
In this case, you don't need the number of ions.
Kind Regards
Parham J. K.
**
**
*==*
*==*
*=*
PhD candidate - Lecturer in drug discovery
Faculty of Medicine and Health
Hi everybody, I’ve generated a water-peptide system, now I want to neutralize
it. Is adding adequate number of ions sufficient for neutralizing process or I
should do QM/MM simulation for the this process? Thank you, Mohammad.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at