Re: [gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-17 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/17/20 7:12 AM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Many thanks for Justin's advice forassigning the same number of PP and PME ranks in each run (30/6 in 5.1.1 and 27/9 in 2019.3). Sorry I am not familiar with these kind of settings, can I ask how to do this exactly? e.g. how to change "gmx mdrun

Re: [gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-17 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Many thanks for Justin's advice forassigning the same number of PP and PME ranks in each run (30/6 in 5.1.1 and 27/9 in 2019.3). Sorry I am not familiar with these kind of settings, can I ask how to do this exactly? e.g. how to change "gmx mdrun -deffnm md_0_1 -cpi -append" ?

Re: [gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-17 Thread Quyen V. Vu
He said he ran a nearly identical simulation on two versions of gromacs but I didn't think so, in 2019.3 logs: There are: 117860 Atoms Atom distribution over 27 domains: av 4365 stddev 75 min 4289 max 4626 and 5.1 logs: There are: 127790 Atoms Atom distribution over 30 domains: av 4259 stddev 90

Re: [gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-16 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/16/20 11:57 AM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: I have re-run the MD, with only 2 ps in both version. Indeed, the Version 2019 is far slower than the Version 5.1.1. Version 2019 needs 114.111 hours to complete 1 ns, while Version 5.1.1 only needs6.362 hours to complete 1 ns. The new logs files

Re: [gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-16 Thread ZHANG Cheng
I have re-run the MD, with only 2 ps in both version. Indeed, the Version 2019 is far slower than the Version 5.1.1. Version 2019 needs 114.111 hours to complete 1 ns, while Version 5.1.1 only needs6.362 hours to complete 1 ns. The new logs files are at

Re: [gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-15 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/15/20 6:58 PM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Hi Justin, what kind of information should I look at in the log files? They are too big to paste here. Would it be possible if you can see them athttps://github.com/lanselibai/gromacs-20200115;? It doesn't look like either of those runs actually

Re: [gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-15 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Hi Justin, what kind of information should I look at in the log files? They are too big to paste here. Would it be possible if you can see them athttps://github.com/lanselibai/gromacs-20200115;? Thank you! --Original-- From:"ZHANG Cheng"<272699...@qq.com;

Re: [gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-15 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/15/20 2:38 PM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: I have a nearly identical run using the "VERSION 2019.3" compared to my previous "VERSION 5.1.1". Everything during the preparation is the same except "-r" needs to be added in the "VERSION 2019.3". So "-r em.gro", "-r nvt.gro" and "-r npt.gro" are

[gmx-users] Why it is run so slow in gromacs 2019.3 compared to VERSION 5.1.1?

2020-01-15 Thread ZHANG Cheng
I have a nearly identical run using the "VERSION 2019.3" compared to my previous "VERSION 5.1.1". Everything during the preparation is the same except "-r" needs to be added in the "VERSION 2019.3". So "-r em.gro", "-r nvt.gro" and "-r npt.gro" are added in the grompp commands for NVT, NPT and