Re: [gmx-users] md-vv and md

2016-07-21 Thread Michael Shirts
Could you file an issue on redmine with sample input files you use? It may be some particular combination of md-vv and some other options that is causing the problem, and it is very hard to debug anything without a precise copy of the inputs that cause the problem. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:28

Re: [gmx-users] md-vv and md

2016-07-21 Thread gozde ergin
Dear all, I am using md-vv integrator in 5.1 and still get this all bulk moving problem. Before I was using 4.6 and informed that this dribble is fixed 5.1 however I still got the same problem. My bulk is moving in z direction however if I use md integrator I do not face with this problem. Any

Re: [gmx-users] md-vv and md

2015-07-20 Thread gozde ergin
Please check my last e-mail I gave some more information about my system and energy results. Here is the link for plots http://imgur.com/HobCa8H,shH3pA9,OZpCUTZ,DeDk35Q,iFDGzXW,67SHwUw,Jj572Wx,2E1TJuH,xNC3D1s,JChHqjO,Z5Uu1l1,2mKA8UO,9DSe8OO#2 On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Michael Shirts

Re: [gmx-users] md-vv and md

2015-07-17 Thread gozde ergin
Hi Michael, Has problem been solved about molecules drifting in md-vv integrator? Also can you please check my potential energy second pic in http://imgur.com/6aJkRoQfjXGmXu#0 . http://imgur.com/6aJkRoQfjXGmXu#0 What could be the reason this big jump in potential energy (integrator : md-vv)? And

Re: [gmx-users] md-vv and md

2015-07-17 Thread Michael Shirts
Has problem been solved about molecules drifting in md-vv integrator? We think so, but some additional tests are running to address any other lingering integrator issues. The fix is in 5.1 beta, but not in the 4.6 branch yet (it's a pull request, but not yet merged). Also can you please check

[gmx-users] md-vv and md

2015-06-22 Thread gozde ergin
Hi all, I was using md-vv as an integrator however I discovered that all bulk was moving (drifting) during the simulation. Than I changed the integrator and used md. The bulk molecules did not move during the simulation, just stayed in the middle of box. I attached the potential and kinetic

Re: [gmx-users] md-vv and md

2015-06-22 Thread gozde ergin
Thanks Michael. On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Michael Shirts mrshi...@gmail.com wrote: At some point, a COM removal step was omitted for md-vv. A change has been proposed in in gerrit for a while (See https://gerrit.gromacs.org/#/c/4649/ and https://gerrit.gromacs.org/#/c/4467/ ), but