Re: [gmx-users] zig-zag stacking

2018-08-06 Thread Lakshman Ji Verma
is step. The potential energy has been alsoincreased quickly and > then reached to steady state. Is the system?in its minimum potential energy > in this step??The potential energy has been almost constantduring the > second equilibration phase and production MD.?These steps performed und

Re: [gmx-users] zig-zag stacking

2018-08-01 Thread Nagasree Garapati
s a lot? -- Message: 3 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:38:41 -0400 From: Dan Gil To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] zig-zag stacking Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I haven't tried it, but I wonder if the gmx

Re: [gmx-users] zig-zag stacking

2018-07-31 Thread Lakshman Ji Verma
Adding on to Dan’s suggestions, you can create a box containing two unit cell using editconf (translate one molecule accordingly) and then replicate that box using genconf to get required confirmation. Thanks! Lakshman On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 6:39 PM Dan Gil wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't tried

Re: [gmx-users] zig-zag stacking

2018-07-31 Thread Dan Gil
Hi, I haven't tried it, but I wonder if the gmx editconf utility can be used to translate groups of atoms, where the group is defined with an index file (make_ndx). Dan On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Nagasree Garapati < nagasree.garap...@mail.wvu.edu> wrote: > Hi All > > > I am trying to

[gmx-users] zig-zag stacking

2018-07-31 Thread Nagasree Garapati
Hi All I am trying to look at the pore space availability and property differences between supercells created by stacking unitcells on top of each other and by zigzag stacking. In Gromacs genconf can be used to create a super cell by stacking unit cells on top of each other, is there a way