Perfect, Thanks!
On 06.03.20 09:00, Christian Blau wrote:
Hi Johannnes,
That is correct.
Another confirmation of what you already suspect is found in the
manual in
http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/current/reference-manual/topologies/molecule-definition.html
Hi Johannnes,
That is correct.
Another confirmation of what you already suspect is found in the manual in
http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/current/reference-manual/topologies/molecule-definition.html
Hi,
For discarding first 1ns , modify the trajectory with *trjconv* with *-b*
flag. Use the modified trajectory for cluster analysis with *gmx cluster*
to get an average
structure from a highly populated cluster.
Thanks & Regards,
--
*Subhomoi Borkotoky, Ph. D.*
Kusuma
On 3/6/20 10:00 AM, Daniel Kozuch wrote:
[Somehow my response got put in a different thread - hopefully this works]
Justin,
Thanks for your reply. I agree that some COM motion is normal. However, this
was a very short simulation (1 ns), so the size of the drift (several nm) was
Hi!
I am trying to minimize two proteins in CCl4 solvent. When I do mdrun -v
-deffnm em, gromacs says too many LINCS warnings
I have tried the following:
1. use smaller time step
2. turn off temperature/pressure coupling
3. play around the lincs entries
Does this mean the minimization is just
[Somehow my response got put in a different thread - hopefully this works]
Justin,
Thanks for your reply. I agree that some COM motion is normal. However, this
was a very short simulation (1 ns), so the size of the drift (several nm) was
unexpected. To test, I repeated the simulation with
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your reply. I have seen the new topology file. But I am
wondering how can I get the mapping of the new POPS. Is there any way that
I can do it myself?
Rabeta Yeasmin
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
Additional (good) news, the problem appears to be resolved in the 2020.1 update
(at least for the membrane only system). I'll conduct some additional tests to
see if there is any lingering problems.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
On
Hi,
I have run some coarse-grained simulations in GROMACS and now I am trying
to learn converting back the system to all-atom. I have set up the
coarse-grained system in CHARMM-GUI, They did not provide the mapping files
and the mapping files all I found in MARTINI website has 13 beads for POPS,
Hello,
we resolved some issues with COM removal in the latest release (please
see the patch notes for more details).
So it might be that you where affected by this before.
Please let us know if the issue shows up again.
Cheers
Paul
On 06/03/2020 18:58, Daniel Kozuch wrote:
Additional
Hello,
Do you want to include the 12 bead POPS model in your Martini CG
simulations?
That is straightforward : Download the "itp" file to the directory with
the "top" file and enter #include "martini_v2.0_POPS_02.itp" with the
hash in the header of the ".top" file. That should be enough to be
On 3/6/20 3:21 PM, Sadaf Rani wrote:
Dear Subhomoi
Thanks for your reply.
I was doing the following:-
discarding 1 ns trajectory by the following command:-
gmx trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.gro -n index.ndx -b 1000 -e 2000 -o
md_1000ps.xtc
If your simulation is longer than 2 ns, you are not just
Yes, a smaller system with only membrane/solvent (no protein) causes the same
issue.
Best,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
On Behalf Of Justin Lemkul
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 11:02 AM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users]
Dear Subhomoi
Thanks for your reply.
I was doing the following:-
discarding 1 ns trajectory by the following command:-
gmx trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.gro -n index.ndx -b 1000 -e 2000 -o
md_1000ps.xtc
Extracting average structure by the following command:-
gmx rmsf -s md.tpr -f md_1000ps.xtc -o
Hi everybody.
Since my first email seemed to be not following the list's nettiquete
rules (sorry for that), I'm trying again.
First, I was not successful in solving this issue on gromacs versions
2018.4, 2019.6 and 2020.1: so, it is consistent among them.
What we are trying to do is to
Thanks Paul! Unfortunately while 2020.1 seems to work for the membrane system
(no protein), for the protein-membrane system I am still having significant COM
motion in the xy plane (i.e. the membrane translates several nm/ns sideways in
its own plane). This happens regardless of coupling the
Hello,
I see the problem now. You are right, the backmapping files have the 13
bead POPS rather that the latest 12 bead POPS. As far as I know the
backmapping files have not been publicly updated but you could try the
Martini forum. If the exact lipid coordinates are absolutely essential
to your
17 matches
Mail list logo