Dear gmx users,
We are trying to simulate polysaccharides, cellulose and hemicellulose in
particular, in GROMACS. The intention is to use GLYCAM forcefield parameters
as well.
My question is, is there any properly quick way to parametrize GLYCAM force
field to be used in GROMACS?
More
Have you tried to source amber before commanding acpype for the conversion?
Apparently it’s looking for antechamber but it can’t access it.
When amber is sourced first, you can get a result from commands such as
antechamber -h
Try to first source your amber, and then run acpype.
> On 1 Nov 2018,
Dear gmx users,
I am trying to simulate a cellobiose, using GROMOS53a6CARBO. The atom names
were modified according to the rtp file of the force field. Yet, I get the
following error while I perform pdb2gmx command:
Fatal error:
Residue 4 named GLC of a molecule in the input file was mappe
mx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx fatal error
On 11/7/18 1:05 PM, Ali Khodayari wrote:
> Dear gmx users,
>
>
>
> I am trying to simulate a cellobiose, using GROMOS53a6CARBO. The atom
> names were modified according to the rtp file of the force field. Yet,
> I get t
Dear Justin,
Thank you for your full explanation. That made it all clear now.
Kind regards,
Ali
> On 13 Nov 2018, at 00:57, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/8/18 1:37 PM, Ali Khodayari wrote:
>> Dear Justin,
>>
>> Thank you for your response. Yet,
Dear Gmx users,
I have two questions.
I am wondering how I can assign residues from different chains to one single
index group? Say, residues 50 to 70 of first chain and residues 120 to 140
of the second chain.
Secondly, how can I assign velocities to certain groups? For instance, to
r
Dear all,
I am trying to compute the stress-strain curves, using the pull code explained
in Justin’s tutorial. I want to put my crystalline cellulose (which is solvated
in water) under tension force at room temperature, and compute the
nano-mechanical properties of the system, e.g. Yield modulus
Dear gmx community,
I am getting a note before performing the energy minimization step, from
grompp that "System has non-zero charge: -0.001135". The system is a
crystalline cellulose, built in Amber, using GLYCAM06 force field and the
topology and coordinate files have been converted to gromac
ent: vrijdag 30 november 2018 20:28
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] non-zero total charge
On 11/29/18 1:13 PM, Ali Khodayari wrote:
> Dear gmx community,
>
>
>
> I am getting a note before performing the energy minimization step,
> from grompp that "Syste
total charge
On 11/29/18 1:13 PM, Ali Khodayari wrote:
> Dear gmx community,
>
>
>
> I am getting a note before performing the energy minimization step,
> from grompp that "System has non-zero charge: -0.001135". The system
> is a
That net charge looks somewha
Dear all,
I am trying to re-center and re-orient an md resulted solute in a box. Yet,
I need the box to hold its position and I only need a group of atoms to
align along z-direction. Trjconv centers the group in the box but the
desired sub-group has a slight inclination which is needed to be or
: zondag 2 december 2018 17:38
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Regarding trjconv
On 12/2/18 11:22 AM, Ali Khodayari wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I am trying to re-center and re-orient an md resulted solute in a box.
> Yet, I need the box to hold its position
Dear all,
I am trying to extract the local stress tensors for a system undergone a
tensile (using the pull code). Can anyone tell me which output (maybe from
edr file) can be related to the local stresses? The aim is to achieve the
stress-strain curves of crystalline cellulose, in reality.
Thank
Dear users,
I am trying to reorient and re-center my solute using editconf. Performing
such I can place the structure at the desired place, yet it is outside the
box when I visualize it in VMD. It leads to an error after mdrun complaining
about a water molecule not being settled.
Here is the
ehalf Of Justin
Lemkul
Sent: dinsdag 15 januari 2019 15:01
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] regarding editconf
On 1/15/19 7:46 AM, Ali Khodayari wrote:
> Dear users,
>
>
>
> I am trying to reorient and re-center my solute using editconf.
> Performing such
/19 9:34 AM, Ali Khodayari wrote:
> Thank you for your response Justin!
> I don't really see how it can cause an error, while it might be just a
> visualization defect in VMD.
> Previously, I tried to perform each step separately, like doing a
> centering by -center 0 0 0, but
Dear Users,
Does it make sense if I use rcoulomb = 0 and rvdw = 0 in order to turn off
non-bonded term calculation during mdrun? If not, is there any
recommendations?
Thank you for your responses in advanced.
Kind regards,
Ali
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
htt
Thank you Justin.
Kind regards, Ali
-Original Message-
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
On Behalf Of Justin
Lemkul
Sent: dinsdag 22 januari 2019 15:59
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] turning off non-bonded terms
On 1/22/19 9:37 AM, Ali
Dear All,
We have simulated a cellulose fiber using GLYCAM06 ff parameters converted
to GROMACS. The model is validated and works properly.
We are investigating the behavior of the material under tensile load.
However, as covalent bonds are modelled with a harmonic potential -as it is
in mos
> dependence on the potential energy also immediately points out an issue
> with your cut-off based approach: how will you deal with the angle(s)?
>
> In literature I have seen some papers of people pulling proteins apart,
> breaking cystein bridges. Those may contain some insig
effects, use a QM method for the parts that are
involved in bond breaking, or use a reactive force field like ReaxFF.
Cheers
Paul
On 2019-02-19 13:35, Ali Khodayari wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> Thank you for your prompt reply.
> I think I can try the morse potential to see how the system respo
ecause there is no influence of
the angle on the potential.
Peter
On 19-02-19 13:35, Ali Khodayari wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> Thank you for your prompt reply.
> I think I can try the morse potential to see how the system responds.
> Could you kindly provide some more info about how t
Dear all,
I am quite new to free energy calculation, so I apologize if the questions
seem naive and of course they are a lot.
My intention is to turn off vdw and coulombic interactions to perform some
tempering cycles on my system. There are though some questions:
1- I only want to decou
Dear Users,
I am trying to use the free energy code to partially shut down the
non-bonded interactions in part of my system.
I only want to decouple interaction in some part of my system, I have put
all the desired residues in groups in the index file. What should I indicate
for the couple_mol
Dear all,
I am trying to solvate a molecule. I am using GLYCAM force field and have
generated the *.gro and *.top files through acpype. I want to include tip3p
parameter sets from amber99sb.ff. Including the tip3p.itp in the topology
file does not suffice as it complains about OW atomtype not foun
Hello all,
I am trying to calculate the dihedral angels of a group of atoms in a
molecule. As I am only interested in part of the molecule, I have manually
made an index file containing the desired atoms in groups using gmx
make_ndx.
Yet, the atom's number in each group is in ascending order. M
Dear all,
I have a question regarding the output of the Coulombic energy from the edr
file.
I am looking at the interactions between two molecules, and trying to
analyse the contribution of different interaction types between these two.
Since hydrogen bonds are formed based on the charge dif
Dear Gromacs users,
I’ve got a question regarding the tabulated potentials for bonded interactions.
Gromacs recognises and reads the non-bonded potential tables through the energy
groups specified. But how can I refer each bond type to its table?
I have derived coarse-grained potentials for a c
Ali Khodayari <
ali.khoday...@student.kuleuven.be> wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users,
>
> I’ve got a question regarding the tabulated potentials for bonded
> interactions.
>
> Gromacs recognises and reads the non-bonded potential tables through
> the energy groups specifie
-users] Tabulated potentials
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 5:17 PM Ali Khodayari <
ali.khoday...@student.kuleuven.be> wrote:
> Thank you Alessandra. However, fixing the topology did not remove the
> error. It still stands as before:
>
> A tabulated bond interaction table numb
Dears,
I would like to ask whether it is possible to install GROMACS on iPad as well?
Obviously I am not trying to run any simulations on it, but to be able to
generate the run files and to transfer them to a cluster. Does it work the same
way you’ll have it on any other MacOS? Of course, consi
Dear gmx users,
I would like to ask whether it is possible to install GROMACS on iPad as
well? Obviously I am not trying to run any simulations on it, but to be able
to generate the run files and to transfer them to a cluster. Does it work
the same way you'll have it on any other MacOS? Of cour
, at 14:43, Ali Khodayari
mailto:ali.khoday...@student.kuleuven.be>
> wrote:
Dear gmx users,
I would like to ask whether it is possible to install GROMACS on iPad as
well? Obviously I am not trying to run any simulations on it, but to be able
to generate the run files and to transfer the
33 matches
Mail list logo