Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa

2017-08-10 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/9/17 10:00 PM, Mohammad Zahidul Hossain Khan wrote: Dear Sir Does anyone know how to measure the SASA energy with unit (kj/mol or kcal/mol) when i give this command: *gmx sasa -f b.trr -s b.tpr -o b.xvg* I got in Y-axix "Area (nm\S2\N)" and when I give this command *gmx sasa -f b.trr -s

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa versus g_sas

2016-02-23 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/23/16 9:45 AM, Sara Del Galdo wrote: Hi Gromacs users, I am using gromacs tool g_sas to calculate protein excluded volumes and I noticed that it provides significant different excluded volume values when compared to the new version gmx sasa tool. Does anyone know the reason of this and wh

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa

2016-01-31 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/31/16 2:24 PM, Eric Smoll wrote: Hello Gromacs Users, "gmx sasa" in Gromacs 5.0.6 returns a message stating that all atom radii are obtained from the following reference: "A. Bondi, van der Waals Volumes and Radii, J. Phys. Chem. 68 (1964) pp. 441-451" Can the user still control the rad

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa output confusion

2015-11-05 Thread Teemu Murtola
That was also part of the bug fix: with the fixed version, you should get the same number of rows and the same areas on each row, but the first column will have the correct residue numbers. Teemu On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, 19:12 Francesco Carbone wrote: > Thank you for your reply, > Everything makes

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa output confusion

2015-11-05 Thread Francesco Carbone
Thank you for your reply, Everything makes sens, the only thing that I still haven't understood is the reason for which I have multiple lines for the residues. Are those atoms? then why are there, if I want the single residue? Regards, Fra On 5 November 2015 at 16:33, Teemu Murtola wrote: > Hi

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa output confusion

2015-11-05 Thread Teemu Murtola
Hi, The issue with incorrect legends and X axis has been fixed in 5.0.6. As for the four columns, you are asking gmx sasa to calculate the same numbers twice, so you get them twice: according to gmx sasa -h, the area of -surface selection is always calculated, and -output (which is optional) just

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa output group not recognised

2015-09-04 Thread Teemu Murtola
The other possibility is that your index groups do not have the atom indices in an increasing order. If this is the case, just sort the atoms, or don't use make_ndx as an intermediate step. Teemu On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, 14:20 Francesco Carbone wrote: > thank you for the reply, but the residues are

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa output group not recognised

2015-09-04 Thread Francesco Carbone
thank you for the reply, but the residues are in the same protein. I simply select a list of residues that interact with the substrate. (echo "r 171 263 201 202 205 395 365 239 360 258"; echo "name 10 G6P"; echo "q") | make_ndx -f $nameprod.gro -o $name1.ndx residues 171 263 201 202 205 395 365 2

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa output group not recognised

2015-09-04 Thread Francesco Carbone
thank you for the reply, but the residues are in the same protein. I simply select a list of residues that interact with the substrate. (echo "r 171 263 201 202 205 395 365 239 360 258"; echo "name 10 G6P"; echo "q") | make_ndx -f $nameprod.gro -o $name1.ndx residues 171 263 201 202 205 395 365 2

Re: [gmx-users] gmx sasa output group not recognised

2015-09-04 Thread Teemu Murtola
Hello, On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:51 PM Francesco Carbone wrote: > I've recently started using gromacs 5.0.4 and I can't make"gmx sasa" to > recognise non-standard groups for the -output flag. > I have three groups (G6P, Co-enzyme and strNADP+; all subset of the dimer ) > and every time I specify