I am creating this separate thread for this draft. Better to have the subject line relevant to the comments/discussion. The authors would love to hear your comments/questions.
Sriram -------------------- We have this updated WG draft in IDR on route leaks detection and mitigation. There is a shift towards using BGP Community (previously it was BGP Attribute) for carrying the Route Leak Protection (RLP) information. The thinking behind this is potentially quicker deployment without dependence on vendor implementation changes. It will be good to discuss this in GROW and get operator inputs on the type of Community (transitive) that might be best suited (Large, Extended, etc.). Updated IDR WG draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-10 Authors’ Team Discussion Slides provide helpful graphics and scenario analyses: https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2018/10/22/rlp_using_bgp_community-v4.pdf Sriram _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
