Hello Grow, We released draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-01, with some editorial changes from the -0 version.
Comments are welcome. The idea of the draft is still to include the path status on bmp updates using the features provided in draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv. Thus, not needing to infer the status implicitly from a BMP source or obtaining it through comparisons of multiple BMP sources. Thanks, Camilo C. > On 31 Oct 2019, at 10:04, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A new version of I-D, draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Camilo Cardona and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv > Revision: 01 > Title: BMP Extension for Path Marking TLV > Document date: 2019-10-31 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 8 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-01.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv/ > Htmlized: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-01 > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-01 > > Abstract: > The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for obtaining > BGP Path information. BGP Path Information is conveyed within BMP > Route Monitoring (RM) messages. This document proposes an extension > to BMP to convey the status of a BGP path after being processed by > the BGP best-path selection algorithm. This extension makes use of > the TLV mechanims described in draft-lucente-bmp-tlv > [I-D.lucente-bmp-tlv]. > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
