Re: [GROW] WG Adoption Call: draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior-01 2018.06.11-2018.06.26
Job Snijders wrote on 11/06/2018 21:59: Please take a moment to read and evaluate the document and let the working group know whether you'd like to continue work on this document as working group or not. yep, sounds good, but what will this do to the vendors' two main weapons, fear and surprise? Nick ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
Re: [GROW] WG Adoption Call: draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior-01 2018.06.11-2018.06.26
I support. Thanks, Jakob -Original Message- From: GROW On Behalf Of Job Snijders Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 2:00 PM To: grow@ietf.org Subject: [GROW] WG Adoption Call: draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior-01 2018.06.11-2018.06.26 Dear working group, The authors of draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior [1] requested the chairs to consider issuing a call for working group adoption. Here is the abstract: "Well-Known BGP Communities are manipulated inconsistently by current implementations. This results in difficulties for operators. It is recommended that removal policies be applied consistently to Well-Known Communities." [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior-01 Please take a moment to read and evaluate the document and let the working group know whether you'd like to continue work on this document as working group or not. We'll close the call on 2018-06-26 Kind regards, Job GROW Personnel ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
Re: [GROW] WG Adoption Call: draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior-01 2018.06.11-2018.06.26
Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:59:39PM +, Job Snijders: > Dear working group, > > The authors of draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior [1] requested the chairs to > consider issuing a call for working group adoption. Here is the > abstract: > > "Well-Known BGP Communities are manipulated inconsistently by > current implementations. This results in difficulties for > operators. It is recommended that removal policies be applied > consistently to Well-Known Communities." > > [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior-01 > > Please take a moment to read and evaluate the document and let the > working group know whether you'd like to continue work on this document > as working group or not. i support adoption, preferring prescription of the process rather than platform nuances. ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
Re: [GROW] WG Adoption Call: draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior-01 2018.06.11-2018.06.26
>> Please take a moment to read and evaluate the document and let the >> working group know whether you'd like to continue work on this >> document as working group or not. > yep, sounds good, but what will this do to the vendors' two main > weapons, fear and surprise? there are so many knobs, that they do not lack targets. job sugggested to add a clause recommending that operators not use 'set' at all to remove communities, but do it explicitly. the authors would appreciate comments on that. randy ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
