Hello Grow,
We released draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-01, with some editorial
changes from the -0 version.
Comments are welcome.
The idea of the draft is still to include the path status on bmp updates
using the features provided in draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv. Thus, not needing to
I would like to express my support for updating the GROW charter and I
think with the addition below it is going into the right direction.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:55 AM Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Job Snijders wrote on 29/10/2019 00:10:
> > My hope is that the proposed update aligns our
Job Snijders wrote on 29/10/2019 00:10:
My hope is that the proposed update aligns our description with our
activities.
It does, but it also aligns with lots of other things. Too generic is
not a good thing.
That said, GROW fulfils an important niche at IETF, not just for
producing its
