As co-author of both drafts I agree with Job to not reference
draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-05.txt at this point in time for future
guidance on recommendations for prepending.
We also discussed this topic between the authors of the Grow draft and
agreed that at this point there is no
Hi all,
(no hats)
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 09:53:44PM +, Keyur Patel wrote:
> IDR is requesting input on the use of AS prepend in BGP policy. This
> begins a 2 week call for requested input on the beneficial use of AS
> Prepend. draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-05.txt indicates there is
> a
[Sending it to IDR & GROW]
Hi Folks,
IDR is requesting input on the use of AS prepend in BGP policy. This begins a 2
week call for requested input on the beneficial use of AS Prepend.
draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-05.txt indicates there is a risk in
excessive prepending. In section 5,
Sasha, would you be able to present this draft and reasoning/etc for it's
existence at the next f2f meeting?
(ietf 113 in vienna in ~1 month or so)
you can present virtually if travel to vienna is problematic (as it is for
me).
-chris
co-chair-persona
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:05 AM Sasha Romijn
Hi there all,
An ongoing topic in the IETF & IESG is how to grow the IETF "leadership
pipeline", so that when we need new AD and / or chairs, we have good
candidates.
Currently when a new chair needs to be appointed the process goes something
like this (with some added hyperbole):
The AD(s)
