[GROW] todo items from GROW @ IETF 118

2023-11-06 Thread Job Snijders
Dear all, The todo items I noted for myself: IETF 119: request 90 minutes Call for working group adoption: draft-pels-grow-yang-bgp-communities Call for working group adoption: draft-fiebig-grow-bgpopsecupd Call for working group adoption: draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats Last Call:

Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for Adoption draft-lucente-grow-bmp-rel (start 25/Oct/2023 end 08/Nov/2023)

2023-11-06 Thread Luuk Hendriks
Hi all, I support adoption of the REL draft, as I believe it will add another (very useful) dimension to how we can use BMP. Thanks, luuk On Wed 25 Oct 2023, 00:57, Job Snijders wrote: > Dear GROW, > > The authors of draft-lucente-grow-bmp-rel asked whether GROW > working group could

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv-13.txt

2023-11-06 Thread Colin Petrie
On 04/11/2023 15:37, Paolo Lucente wrote: But making these TLVs mandatory feels a bit too strong and/or inflexible.  I'm wondering whether TBD4 and TBD5 should be combined in a single, optional TLV: if present, it contains all information you need for stateless parsing (i.e. for now that's

[GROW] draft-pels-grow-yang-bgp-communities-00

2023-11-06 Thread Martin Pels
Hi all, Based on various discussions since my presentation in London, I have submitted a draft for a YANG module to describe BGP communities: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pels-grow-yang-bgp-communities/ There is also a github repository with some example JSON community