heasley wrote:
> Ignoring support or opposition for the topic of the thread, why should
> the ietf concern itself with programming (and testing) incompetency of
> this magnitude? The RFCs should document the procedure to negotiate
> the capability, not endeavor to design for every possible
Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:20:43PM +, Nick Hilliard:
> First, it's not guaranteed
> that some badly coded bgp stack wouldn't crash with a 4097 byte OPEN
> message, and secondly, you're not guaranteed that just because the stack
> supports 4097 bytes on open due to e.g. unintentional coding
