Dear all,
The WGLC has concluded. A few people spoke out in favor of publication,
no objections were raised. I'll work on the shepherd write-up.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Job
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:20:36PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> As requested during the IETF 118 GROW
Surely Maxence, thanks for your comment. I will update the draft with
this note.
Paolo
On 25/1/24 07:53, Maxence Younsi wrote:
Dear all,
I support the adoption of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up.
A small detail I think could be changed is that the definition of a
string in Section 2 should
Dear GROW,
I highly appreciate the work accomplished by this document to clarify many
aspects of BMP and pose it for even more future extensibility, and I support
the publication of the document.
Best,
-Ahmed
On 22.01.2024, 20:21, "GROW on behalf of Job Snijders"
Dear all,
I support the adoption of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up.
A small detail I think could be changed is that the definition of a
string in Section 2 should specify that the length in the TLV's Length
field is in bytes and not a number of character ("whose length *in
bytes* is given by
Dear GROW,
Thanks a lot! I support the publication of the document.
Best wishs
Thomas
-Original Message-
From: GROW On Behalf Of Job Snijders
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 8:21 PM
To: grow@ietf.org
Subject: [GROW] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up
(start
Dear all,
As requested during the IETF 118 GROW session in Prague, Czechia, a
"Working Group Last Call" is now issued for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up.
This phase will last about 2 weeks. We'd love to hear from you,
especially from BMP implementers!
Please review the document, consider whether it
