Re: [GROW] route leak solution and IANA large community register
Dear Sriram, Sue, Working Group Last Call is possible, but I suspect after WGLC it will not be possible for the document to progress beyond the Shepherd Write-up step, because the current -04 version essentially is blocking on a normative dependency on 'draft-heitz-idr-wklc' (or any successor). My recommendation would be to let both efforts proceed independently, as it probably would be good to continue discussion on whether draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation's objective can only be solved with Large Communities; and separately whether in the large communities 'space' a segment of the 'spectrum' should be set aside for future well-known through standards documented signaling. Kind regards, Job GROW Working Group Chair On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:30:14PM -0500, Susan Hares wrote: > Sriram: > > If IDR adopts the draft, you can ask for early allocation on the registry. > Before that point, let me chat with the IDR co-chairs and ADs to what other > options you have. > > Cheers, Sue > > -Original Message- > From: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) [mailto:kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov] > Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 6:26 PM > To: Christopher Morrow; Job Snijders > Cc: grow-cha...@ietf.org; GROW WG; idr-cha...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; > a.e.azi...@gmail.com > Subject: route leak solution and IANA large community register > > I have a question for the GROW Chairs and anyone who can help. > > There are these two drafts: > Methods for Detection and Mitigation of BGP Route Leaks > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation- > 04 > > BGP Well Known Large Community > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-heitz-idr-wklc-01 > > The first is in a mature state in GROW and the second is in a > pre-adoption-call state in IDR. The first draft requests IANA for an > allocation in well-known Large Community (WKLC) registry but no such IANA > registry exists yet. The second draft (in IDR) is making an effort to > specify and request the creation of an IANA WKLC registry. This work seems > to be going slow in IDR -- partly the authors are responsible (including > me). > > Question: Is the creation of an IANA Large Community registry a prerequisite > for a WGLC on the first one (in GROW)? Or, it is possible to have WGLC > requested/completed on the first one and then wait for the creation of the > IANA LC registry? > > Thanks. > > Sriram > > > > ___ > GROW mailing list > GROW@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
Re: [GROW] route leak solution and IANA large community register
Sriram: If IDR adopts the draft, you can ask for early allocation on the registry. Before that point, let me chat with the IDR co-chairs and ADs to what other options you have. Cheers, Sue -Original Message- From: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) [mailto:kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov] Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 6:26 PM To: Christopher Morrow; Job Snijders Cc: grow-cha...@ietf.org; GROW WG; idr-cha...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; a.e.azi...@gmail.com Subject: route leak solution and IANA large community register I have a question for the GROW Chairs and anyone who can help. There are these two drafts: Methods for Detection and Mitigation of BGP Route Leaks https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation- 04 BGP Well Known Large Community https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-heitz-idr-wklc-01 The first is in a mature state in GROW and the second is in a pre-adoption-call state in IDR. The first draft requests IANA for an allocation in well-known Large Community (WKLC) registry but no such IANA registry exists yet. The second draft (in IDR) is making an effort to specify and request the creation of an IANA WKLC registry. This work seems to be going slow in IDR -- partly the authors are responsible (including me). Question: Is the creation of an IANA Large Community registry a prerequisite for a WGLC on the first one (in GROW)? Or, it is possible to have WGLC requested/completed on the first one and then wait for the creation of the IANA LC registry? Thanks. Sriram ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
[GROW] route leak solution and IANA large community register
I have a question for the GROW Chairs and anyone who can help. There are these two drafts: Methods for Detection and Mitigation of BGP Route Leaks https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation-04 BGP Well Known Large Community https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-heitz-idr-wklc-01 The first is in a mature state in GROW and the second is in a pre-adoption-call state in IDR. The first draft requests IANA for an allocation in well-known Large Community (WKLC) registry but no such IANA registry exists yet. The second draft (in IDR) is making an effort to specify and request the creation of an IANA WKLC registry. This work seems to be going slow in IDR -- partly the authors are responsible (including me). Question: Is the creation of an IANA Large Community registry a prerequisite for a WGLC on the first one (in GROW)? Or, it is possible to have WGLC requested/completed on the first one and then wait for the creation of the IANA LC registry? Thanks. Sriram ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
