Very much IMO:
Don't take meeting time slots to say "nothing's changed, the document's
ready". Just WGLC it. :-)
-- Jeff
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:24:39PM +0200, Colin Petrie wrote:
> I'll be there, so if anyone thinks it needs discussion, I am happy to
> talk about it. Or we can just go for WG
I'll be there, so if anyone thinks it needs discussion, I am happy to
talk about it. Or we can just go for WGLC and see what comes up then :)
Cheers
Colin
On 20/10/16 16:20, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> Do you want to schedule time to chat about this in the in-person meeting?
>
> On Tue, Oct 18,
Do you want to schedule time to chat about this in the in-person meeting?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Colin Petrie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I thought I'd re-open discussion on this draft, as I bumped it with a
> couple of typo fixes that had been reported to me since the last revision.
>
> But
Hi all,
I thought I'd re-open discussion on this draft, as I bumped it with a
couple of typo fixes that had been reported to me since the last revision.
But there hasn't been any further feedback - is that because everyone is
happy with it? :) Does it need any more work?
Cheers,
Colin
On 08/07
