Re: [grpc-io] How close is gRPC to a release candidate?

Hi Louis, Thank you for the milestones information, and am comfortable to hear that more options are being evaluated for engaging users with the progress. Some of the milestones make sense, but some feel like tickets on issues, and the Jenkins ones I do not believe fall under user features.

[grpc-io] Load balancing gRPC servers

In the past I've used haproxy to load balance all sorts of things. I would imagine a TCP based load balancing would be sufficient to ensure high availability. Has anyone tried this or has any advice on this matter? TIA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [grpc-io] Re: gRPC 1.0.0-pre1 release packages are now available for testing

Remember there's no such thing as bad feedback. We want to know how it works for you based on your typical usage case. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 5:49 PM, 'Kailash Sethuraman' via grpc.io < grpc-io@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > At the moment, the website (grpc.io) documentation not fully reflect the

[grpc-io] Re: gRPC 1.0.0-pre1 release packages are now available for testing

At the moment, the website (grpc.io) documentation not fully reflect the pre-release. They reference the last full release, 0.15. I would recommend something in-between both the paths you mention. Try these packages in your test environments as you normally would, see if it works and report any

Re: [grpc-io] How close is gRPC to a release candidate?

Paul, On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Paul Grosu wrote: > > I understand the need, but rushing things with a complex programming > project such as this does not always translate into quality. With this > project I would prefer Google to take their time to do it right. The

[grpc-io] Re: gRPC 1.0.0-pre1 release packages are now available for testing

Hi Kailash, This is fantastic news! Big Congratulations to the whole team! Just wondering how thoroughly should we test these releases? Basically should we put: - A naive user hat (i.e. let me find the documentation and follow it), or - An expert user hat (i.e. let me tweak the

Re: [grpc-io] gRPC call time overhead

A step function like that is pretty odd. What kind of payload are you using? Just to isolate that out could you benchmark your message serialization for the same range of sizes? As a general rule I would expect to see a benchmark of sequential request/responses with 'typical' 1k protobufs between

[grpc-io] gRPC 1.0.0-pre1 release packages are now available for testing

Hi Everyone, The gRPC team is pleased to announce that we have our first 1.0-pre packages ready for testing. Instructions and release notes below. Please give these a try and report any issues via our issue trackers on Github, it will help ensure that our 1.0 release is robust and works

[grpc-io] [grpc-objc] close all http2 connexion

Hi, i'm trying to close all tcp / http2 connexions for a gRPC objective-c client for when my app goes in background (i want absolutely 0 activity in this case). Calling "cancel" on the GRPCall closes ongoing gRPC streams, but doesn't close the underlying tcp connexion (i guess because reusing

Re: [grpc-io] Compatibility of gRPC with Java web servers (Tomcat, Jetty, etc.)

Thanks Louis - appreciated. On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 8:08:18 PM UTC-6, Louis Ryan wrote: > > Currently the GRPC server won't port share with your servlet engine which > may or may not be a consideration for you. GRPC does not use classloader > magic so you're unlikely to have issues

Re: [grpc-io] How close is gRPC to a release candidate?

I understand the need, but rushing things with a complex programming project such as this does not always translate into quality. With this project I would prefer Google to take their time to do it right. The gRPC team are doing fantastic service, but already they feel way too stretched out

Re: [grpc-io] How close is gRPC to a release candidate?

Thanks for the replies. Initially my main uses will be in Java, Node, and C#. On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 8:32:35 PM UTC-7, Nathaniel Manista wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:56 AM, wrote: > >> I know that different parts of gRPC are more mature than others but in >>