[grpc-io] Re: [grpc-java 1.0.0] Use grpc in production causes memory leak

Have worked out what the issue is. GRPC 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 are both based on Netty 4.1.3.Final. This version of Netty is affected by a memory leak bug referenced and fixed in the following commit: https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/94d7557dead5e7780769d44bbb4aa7530149ca34 The vanilla GRPC

Re: [grpc-io] gRPC static paths?

Its the difference between "/service/method" (a fixed string identifying the operation - RPC) and /collection/{resource-id} (where a parameter of the call is a variable component of the REST path). Using fixed strings speeds up dispatching logic and on HTTP2 improves header caching behaviors. On

[grpc-io] gRPC static paths?

Hi I am reading gRPC FAQ "Why is gRPC better/worse than REST?" The answer says "We diverge from typical REST conventions as we use static paths for performance reasons during call dispatch as parsing call parameters from paths, query parameters and payload body adds latency and complexity."

Re: [grpc-io] gRPC compilation for XP (v140_xp)

That sounds like a good summary of the complications with XP. We have no plans to support the platform, especially since it's well past end of life. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:39 AM Amit Waisel wrote: > I am trying to compile the C++ code for XP platform. I know it is not >

[grpc-io] gRPC compilation for XP (v140_xp)

I am trying to compile the C++ code for XP platform. I know it is not officially supported. By changing the _WIN32_WINNT to 0x501 in global.props, I get many errors: 1. Using RTL_RUN_ONCE API which is supported Vista+ only 2. Support for IPv6 (inet_ntop at

Re: [grpc-io] gRPC setting max Threads

Hi,I am using JAVA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

[grpc-io] Re: [grpc-java 1.0.0] Use grpc in production causes memory leak

We have just encountered the same issue, been in production for about a week, exactly the same leak. We have just started investigating. Will let you know how we go. Cheers Craig On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:26:34 AM UTC+8, Taehyun Park wrote: > > Hello I have a memory leak problem

[grpc-io] Client fast fail

In one part of my C++ app, I'm using gRPC as IPC to control a server daemon. When the daemon is not running, there's nothing listening on the designated port. Nevertheless, the client call is bounded by the deadline. Shouldn't the call fail immediately if there is no port listening ? This