[grpc-io] Re: gRPC Java server fails under load tester after a few days

Hey Edvard, Take a look at this thread: https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/issues/4544. > Panic is legitimate here. If the executor queue is full, the channel can't submit any work to it. It can't even fail the RPC, because the executor can't even run ClientCall.Listener.onClose(). Logging

Re: [grpc-io] who else is looking for an active (discord) community?

The "Unofficial gRPC Community" Discord server from the last discussion was essentially a failed experiment. People joined, but there was not a *single* discussion. Gitter actually has some activity, so it isn't dead but rather

Re: [grpc-io] URGENT: Sending async response over grpc

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 1:11 PM Abhijeet Tiwari wrote: > 1) let's say a java based client that has opened a server streaming rpc > 2) after this, we are to receive some info through a webhook on our > server, but it might take some time > 3) we have to send this info received over webhook to the

Re: [grpc-io] Re: who else is looking for an active (discord) community?

There is an "Unofficial gRPC Community" server on Discord. It is not active, but I think it is better to join that one than start a new one. On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 7:07 AM Fabio Andres Pino Gutierrez < fabpi...@gmail.com> wrote: > indeed > > El lunes, 18 de marzo de 2024 a la(s) 9:53:11 p.m.

[grpc-io] Re: who else is looking for an active (discord) community?

indeed El lunes, 18 de marzo de 2024 a la(s) 9:53:11 p.m. UTC-5, ji-podhead escribió: > theres no channel on discord. gitter and git-discussion are dead. > i dont have any slack invites. > k8s groups have no grpc sub. > maybe we should start a server on our own? > love from germany: > ji > --

Re: [grpc-io] who else is looking for an active (discord) community?

INDEED! Sent from Mailspring (https://link.getmailspring.com/link/9bb5a3ec-703b-421a-b623-f557c0992...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgetmailspring.com%2F=Z3JwYy1pb0Bnb29nbGVncm91cHMuY29t), the best free email app for work On Mar 15 2024, at 1:22 pm, ji-podhead wrote: > theres no