[grpc-io] Re: C++ gRPC Version for Generating C# .NET Compatible Proto Wrappers

2021-02-16 Thread Luke S
Let me know if any further information is required, we are still curious about the answer! On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 11:26:12 AM UTC-6 Luke S wrote: > Thanks for your reply Jan, my apologies I should have been more specific > in what our issue was. Specifically, our current generations

[grpc-io] Re: C++ gRPC Version for Generating C# .NET Compatible Proto Wrappers

2021-02-08 Thread Luke S
Thanks for your reply Jan, my apologies I should have been more specific in what our issue was. Specifically, our current generations of service objects from our protos yields C# code that utilizes the Channel class , whereas their

[grpc-io] Re: C++ gRPC Version for Generating C# .NET Compatible Proto Wrappers

2021-02-08 Thread 'Jan Tattermusch' via grpc.io
The protobuf C# library has always worked just fine with the grpc-dotnet implementation. We've made some changes in the generated code over time, but even the ancient versions of the generated code should just work with grpc-dotnet. In gRPC C# (not the codegen) we've made some changes to

[grpc-io] Re: C++ gRPC Version for Generating C# .NET Compatible Proto Wrappers

2021-02-04 Thread Luke S
Right, this is definitely the known, recommended process and will likely be a goal of ours in the long run. Unfortunately, in the short to mid-term this won't work for us for the following reasons: - The client is internal and does not have the time to add this to their process right

[grpc-io] Re: C++ gRPC Version for Generating C# .NET Compatible Proto Wrappers

2021-02-03 Thread 'Christopher Warrington - MSFT' via grpc.io
On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 8:14:54 AM UTC-8 Luke S wrote: > ... to obtain the version of protoc/plugin to enable me to generate these > more modern files for our clients? Typically, one shares the .proto files with consumers--not the generated code. This lets them generate code however