2 blocking calls on the same channel do not block each other, they will
execute concurrently.
The main reason to use asynchronous calls is when the caller themselves
cannot block, for instance in a non blocking server (think of something
similar to nodeJS).
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:29 PM
So you would say it’s ok to create for every call a new stub. But what about
concurrency? Let’s say I create two stubs and they make a call at the same time
on the same channel. Is one stub blocks the other one? So when you would use
asynchronous calls?
--
You received this message because
Channels are relatively heavier weight and thus it could be a good idea to
not create a lot of them (unless you hit some throughput bottleneck). Stubs
are pretty cheap.
Channels and stubs are all thread-safe.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:22 PM wrote:
> Sorry, i meant "Is it better to also create
Sorry, i meant "Is it better to also create only one stub for all these
calls or to create a stub for every function call..."
Am Dienstag, 12. November 2019 22:18:15 UTC+1 schrieb
martin...@versasec.com:
>
> After hours of reading on internet and not getting an answer i will ask
> here. We are
