update-grub2

2006-10-15 Thread Robert Millan
Hi there, This is my proposal for a new dessign in update-grub. As you might know, update-grub is a script used in Debian to generate GRUB config file. Over time, we've found that the monolithic dessign of that script made it difficult to maintain and extend, and it ultimately has become

Re: update-grub2

2006-10-15 Thread Declan Naughton
Maybe this isn't the right place, but.. I've been pissed off a couple of times by my grub config being overwritten after installing a new kernel on Ubuntu (presumably the same happens on Debian) - I don't get why it doesn't simply add the new kernel rather than regenerate the entire file? If

Re: update-grub2

2006-10-15 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Declan Naughton wrote: Maybe this isn't the right place, but.. I've been pissed off a couple of times by my grub config being overwritten after installing a new kernel on Ubuntu (presumably the same happens on Debian) - I don't get why it doesn't

Re: GRUB 1.95 is released

2006-10-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
* Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061015 16:51]: * Number partitions from 1 instead of 0. For instance, the first partition of hd0 is now hd0,1 but not hd0,0. Hm. What's the reason for being inconsistent here? If changing the partition naming scheme, I would have thought it'd

Re: GRUB 1.95 is released

2006-10-15 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Vladimir Serbinenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061015 17:36]: Hm. What's the reason for being inconsistent here? If changing the partition naming scheme, I would have thought it'd become hd1,1. But why is the first disk 0 and the first partition 1? Using Linux style names might make sense as

Re: GRUB 1.95 is released

2006-10-15 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061015 17:41]: It was already discussed plenty of times and the answer is that with BIOS it's impossible to guess the linux's names, so it would just confuse the users Or it may be Solaris or OS/2 Warp or some OS not yet released. I enjoy the amusement

Re: GRUB 1.95 is released

2006-10-15 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061015 17:35]: * Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061015 16:51]: * Number partitions from 1 instead of 0. For instance, the first partition of hd0 is now hd0,1 but not hd0,0. Hm. What's the reason for being inconsistent here? If changing the

GRUB 1.95 is released

2006-10-15 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
I'm happy to announce the release of GRUB 1.95. This is the sixth of our prereleases leading up to GRUB 2.0. We encourage you to try it, as we have done a significant amount of work towards GRUB 2. Note that this release is mainly for developers who are willing to contribute to our project. If

Re: GRUB 1.95 is released

2006-10-15 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061015 16:51]: * Number partitions from 1 instead of 0. For instance, the first partition of hd0 is now hd0,1 but not hd0,0. Hm. What's the reason for being inconsistent here? If changing the partition naming scheme, I would have thought it'd become

Re: GRUB 1.95 is released

2006-10-15 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
At Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:31:04 +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061015 16:51]: * Number partitions from 1 instead of 0. For instance, the first partition of hd0 is now hd0,1 but not hd0,0. Hm. What's the reason for being inconsistent here? If