On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 14:48 +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070702 10:17]:
The following lines in grub_ofconsole_init():
/* The latest PowerMacs don't actually initialize the screen for us, so we
* use this trick to re-open the output device. */
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 20:16 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hi,
I spotted another regression, caused by the following commits:
2007-02-21 Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* kern/powerpc/ieee1275/init.c (HEAP_SIZE): Removed.
(HEAP_LIMIT): New macro.
(grub_claim_heap):
Hello,
I would like to discuss the possibility of migrating to GPL version 3. As you
know, GPLv3 has been published, and all GNU software is recommended to
migrate from GPLv2 to GPLv3.
When we look at only GRUB 2, there should be no problem. Nearly all code is
copyrighted by the Free Software
On 04/07/07, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:14:40PM -0400, Alex Roman wrote:
On 28/06/07, Alex Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the code require a BIOS to work, i.e., do you rely on BIOS
callbacks in the CDROM code? It would be great if you would _not_ do
On 04/07/07, Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the fact that nobody is really willing to maintain GRUB Legacy, we need
to consider which is more important, migrating to GPLv3, or keeping it easy
to backport fixes to GRUB Legacy from GRUB 2. I myself prefer to migrate to
GPLv3,
I think we should leave Grub Legacy GPL v2 and move Grub 2 to GPL v3.
Given Grub Legacy really has had little work on it and most distros
are maintaining their own patches anyway. With little to no work on
Grub Legacy going on anyway, no reason to create work for it :-) . I
see Grub Legacy dieing
* Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070704 21:40]:
Hello,
I would like to discuss the possibility of migrating to GPL version 3. As you
know, GPLv3 has been published, and all GNU software is recommended to
migrate from GPLv2 to GPLv3.
[..]
1. What are the pros and cons? A discussion
* Jeroen Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070704 23:10]:
Are you sure about this? Given that we've assigned copyright to the
FSF, the FSF can decide under which free software license to license
that code. So I don't really see why we can't release the same code
under GPLv2 or later in GRUB Legacy
On 04/07/07, Alex Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/07/07, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:14:40PM -0400, Alex Roman wrote:
That will be the second stage of my Summer of Code project... Provided
people have no objections against my patch, and all is well, I
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
[...]
So I bet that GRUB Legacy should remain under GPLv2. But this can cause some
problem potentially. Let's say, we find the same bug both in GRUB Legacy and
in GRUB 2. In the current trend, the bug would be fixed in GRUB 2 sooner. But
10 matches
Mail list logo
