- Original Message
From: Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The development of GRUB 2 grub-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, 4 September, 2008 11:07:46 PM
Subject: Re: Windows,grub and grub2
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Viswesh S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
From:
Am Dienstag, den 09.09.2008, 00:32 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:02:30AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
There seems to be now a increased git interest floating around ;)
Gah, no that was just me porting a program to Multiboot, which happened to
be hosted on git ;-)
Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:47:11AM +0200, phcoder wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:27:05PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:54:43PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
BTW GPT module checks the protective MBR. In some cases
Am Dienstag, den 09.09.2008, 15:06 +0200 schrieb phcoder:
Robert Millan wrote:
Can you be more specific about what's wrong in svn? I believe ./autogen.sh
should fix your local tree.
i386-pc.mk and common.mk are regenerated if necessary by make command
but i386.mk isn't.
Vladimir
Am Dienstag, den 09.09.2008, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Javier MartÃn:
In order to load modules you have to be root, so don't you think that if
someone gets to the point he would be able to load modules in your
server the battle is already lost?
It's a easy way to get a bit more security.
A kernel
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 12:00:55 pm Robert Millan wrote:
Unless you're talking about GRUB modules, I think this is a bit off-topic.
Probably, but it is logical that the discussion started here.
May I suggest you continue the discussion off the list? It's quite hard to
keep track of
