diff --git a/grub-core/kern/x86_64/efi/startup.S
b/grub-core/kern/x86_64/efi/startup.S
index f86f019..94bd6ae 100644
--- a/grub-core/kern/x86_64/efi/startup.S
+++ b/grub-core/kern/x86_64/efi/startup.S
@@ -29,7 +29,11 @@ start:
_start:
movq%rcx,
On 13.11.2013 03:26, Josh Triplett wrote:
EFI supports allocating memory below a specified address; use that to
implement GRUB_MMAP_MALLOC_LOW by requesting memory below 1M.
As discussed on the IRC, using mmap isn't right way to allocate
transient low memory space. This would merit a separate
On 13.11.2013 04:59, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:26:39 -0800
Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org пишет:
EFI supports allocating memory below a specified address; use that to
implement GRUB_MMAP_MALLOC_LOW by requesting memory below 1M.
Out of curiosity - why would you
On 13.11.2013 14:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 09:40:29PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
On 15.07.2013 20:00, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey,
There is a discussion on the linux-kernel mailing list in which the
Linus states that if you
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It doesn't seem to understand sub-partitions. I can get it to work if
the boot files are in /dev/xvda but not in /dev/xvda1 .
insmod part_msdos
insmod part_gpt
Right, if I add those to
This patch brings support for UEFI on the 64-bit ARM architecture.
It does not yet include a Linux loader, as the boot protocol for
UEFI platforms is not yet fully agreed. The chainloader can be used
to load a kernel with an integrated UEFI stub loader.
Instructions for how to build and set up
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013-11-10 19:01 (Europe/Helsinki):
Hello, all. We've switched to git some time ago, now we should have some
kind of workflow documents. In particular I think of following points:
- Developpers with commit access can create branches as they see fit as
long
Good work. Few minor problems:
On 14.11.2013 13:35, Leif Lindholm wrote:
+
+ grub_arch_sync_caches_real (address, len);
Why not do alignment here? You could align for both dcache and icache,
this simplifies asm part and makes it a bit more robust.
+ grub_uint32_t insword, insmask;
+
On 14.11.2013 13:35, Leif Lindholm wrote:
This patch brings support for UEFI on the 64-bit ARM architecture.
It does not yet include a Linux loader, as the boot protocol for
UEFI platforms is not yet fully agreed. The chainloader can be used
to load a kernel with an integrated UEFI stub
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:12:28PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
It depends on Vladimir's __ctz[sd]i2 implementation, without which
grub-mkimage will fail with a missing symbol error.
I haven't seen ctz? Is it not needed after all or do you use my patch?
Apologies
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:06:25PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
Good work. Few minor problems:
On 14.11.2013 13:35, Leif Lindholm wrote:
+
+ grub_arch_sync_caches_real (address, len);
Why not do alignment here? You could align for both dcache and icache,
this
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It doesn't seem to understand sub-partitions. I can get it to work if
the boot files are in /dev/xvda but not in /dev/xvda1 .
insmod part_msdos
On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It doesn't seem to understand sub-partitions. I can get it to work if
the boot files are in /dev/xvda but
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It doesn't seem to understand
On 14.11.2013 19:48, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 13.11.2013 20:06, M A Young wrote:
It
On 14.11.2013 19:57, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 19:48, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Vladimir
---
grub-core/Makefile.core.def | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
index 6114519..4fff57f 100644
--- a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
+++ b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
@@ -1914,6 +1914,7 @@ module = {
module = {
name =
Go ahead.
On 14.11.2013 20:59, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
---
grub-core/Makefile.core.def | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def b/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
index 6114519..4fff57f 100644
--- a/grub-core/Makefile.core.def
+++
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 19:57, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 19:48, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 18:03, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov
On 14.11.2013 22:11, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 19:57, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013 19:48, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On 14.11.2013
On lun, 2013-11-11 at 10:10 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 21:52 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
Hello, all. pvgrub2 has just became part of upstream grub as ports i386-xen
and x86_64-xen.
This is super cool, thanks!
Indeed!
Actually, it would be
Sources at 6fcec439545c817fbc8e2f51c667a70037a34a76
Building RPM for PPC (32 or 64 bits) I get
[ 187s] cat syminfo.lst | sort | gawk -f ../../grub-core/genmoddep.awk
moddep.lst || (rm -f moddep.lst; exit 1)
[ 187s] __ashldi3 in affs is not defined
[ 187s] _restgpr_14_x in affs is not
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
The x86-64 ABI specification requires a 16-byte-aligned stack. In some
cases, GCC emits code that assumes this alignment, which crashes if not
aligned. The EFI firmware is also entitled to assume that stack
alignment
23 matches
Mail list logo
