On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:35:05 -0500
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 2/12/21 4:58 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > And you're right the merge request part is not ideal. There
> > is redundancy, but I don't think its that big of a deal. There does
> > come more confusion when determining what patch series
On 2/12/21 4:58 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> There are two main parts to this work, the CI and the merge request
> automation. As I see it, your issue is not with the CI, but the merge
> requests.
Yes -- CI is indeed wonderful to have and should be implemented if
possible (which it always is,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:53:37PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> Hi fellow GRUB developers,
>
> I want to start by recognizing that most people who are involved with
> the project maintenance are doing so on a voluntary basis (or at least
> that's my assumption) and people have busy lives. Its a
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 23:50:38 -0500
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 2/11/21 10:53 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > For patches that people don't want to disappear on the list, I
> > think a merge request can help mitigate that. Also since the merge
> > request is effectively a whole commit tree, instead of
Note: There is a bug in code below which will let this code fail on
BIOS-UEFI and requires a v3 as soon as basic discussion whether this
sort of functionality is accepted at all is done.
I don't want to disturb thread by a v3 thread.
KR
Michael
Am 05.02.2021 um 10:02 schrieb Michael Lawnick:
Am 11.02.2021 um 18:16 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
On 11.02.21 17:01, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Am 11.02.2021 um 15:04 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
On 11.02.21 13:50, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Hi,
Several boot parameters are stored in our SPI flash to configure the
systems for different use cases.
