Re: RFC: Grub project management

2021-02-13 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 23:50 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote: [...] > It would probably make more sense to use a patchwork configured to > run CI on incoming patches, and maybe even respond to the mailing > list with status reports. > > e.g. > > https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/patches/20108 >

Re: RFC: Grub project management

2021-02-13 Thread Daniel Axtens
> Reading more about patchwork, it seems to have its own set of issues, > partly revolving around using a mailing list of development as we do. > see: https://lwn.net/Articles/773456/ I'm a patchwork maintainer, happy to discuss how Patchwork might be helpful. It certainly isn't perfect (and

Re: RFC: Grub project management

2021-02-13 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 2/12/21 11:00 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote: > I poked around on a sourcehut account a little and its not obvious that > can can integrate with an existing mailing list. It looks like it > expects to host the mailinglist. I'm thinking there might be a way to > configure it act like a peer

Re: RFC: Grub project management

2021-02-13 Thread Glenn Washburn
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:16:39 -0500 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:53:37PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote: > > I believe I speak for more than just myself when I say that the > > current development process leaves much to be desired. GRUB has > > been in a feature freeze