On 14.03.2024 15:24, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 1:37 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.03.2024 10:30, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:24 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> In addition to the existing address and ELF lo
On 14.03.2024 10:30, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:24 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>>> In addition to the existing address and ELF load types, specify a new
>>> optional PE binary load type. This new type is a useful addition since
>>>
On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> In addition to the existing address and ELF load types, specify a new
> optional PE binary load type. This new type is a useful addition since
> PE binaries can be signed and verified (i.e. used with Secure Boot).
And the consideration to have ELF signa
On 01.04.2021 21:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 01/04/2021 09:44, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 01.04.2021 03:06, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
And the obvious next question: is my EVE usecase esoteric enough that
I should just go a
On 01.04.2021 03:06, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> And the obvious next question: is my EVE usecase esoteric enough that
> I should just go ahead and do a custom GRUB patch or is there a more
> general interest in this?
Not sure if it ought to be a grub patch - the issue could as well
be dealt with in
