On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:05:47PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:07 AM Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:07:43PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > > Binaries may be built with entry points above 4G. While bootloaders may
> > > relocate them below
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 02:46:59PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 1:18 PM Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:07:42PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > > Currently, multiboot2-compatible bootloaders can load ELF binaries and
> > > a.out binaries. The
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:07:42PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> Currently, multiboot2-compatible bootloaders can load ELF binaries and
> a.out binaries. The presence of the address header tag determines
> how the bootloader tries to interpret the binary (a.out if the address
> tag is present
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:24:31PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 1:37 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > On 14.03.2024 10:30, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:24 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > >>> In
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:07:43PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> Binaries may be built with entry points above 4G. While bootloaders may
> relocate them below 4G, it should be possible for the binary to specify
> those entry points. Therefore, extend the multiboot2 protocol such that
> 64 bit
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 04:15:24PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 05:06:54PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne via Grub-devel
> wrote:
> > On failure to allocate from grub_relocator_firmware_alloc_region() in
> > malloc_in_range() the function would stop enforcing the alignment, and
>
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.04.2021 03:06, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > And the obvious next question: is my EVE usecase esoteric enough that
> > I should just go ahead and do a custom GRUB patch or is there a more
> > general interest in this?
>
> Not sure
