On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:51 AM Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 06/04/2021 09:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 01.04.2021 21:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 01/04/2021 09:44, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:19 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.04.2021 21:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 01/04/2021 09:44, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.04.2021 03:06, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> &
Hi Andrew!
first of all -- thanks for pointing me in the right direction. So after
reading relevant sources: comments inline.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:08 PM Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 30/03/2021 19:28, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > seems like I've run int
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>> A scripting language that is actively maintained and used for writing
>> extensions
>> to GRUB. My original understanding was that Lua would fit this descripti
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
>> Aha! So the Lua license really is a red herring here..
>>
>>
> We already explained the reasons.
You did. But, unfortunately, your explanation was not entirely correct. Which
is fine, because thanks to Robert I now know the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> First of all, there's no license problem. We usually write our own code, but
> when we have specific reasons to import it from another project, any license
> that is compatible with GPL (v3 and later) would be considered suitable.
Aha! So t
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
>> I'd appreciated knowing non-licensing reasons as well.
>>
> The only other reason was to encourage developpement of sh-like scripting.
Fair enough. Would it be, then, fair to say that Lua was never meant to be
a script
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 10.11.2009, 19:38 -0800 schrieb Roman Shaposhnik:
>> Browsing the archives of grub-devel reveals that Lua support was moved to
>> grub-extras which makes me ask these two questions:
>> 1. Was
Hi!
I was very excited to see Ubuntu 9.10 being one of the first distributions to
officially switch to GRUB v2, but there was one fly in that ointment
of happiness -- the lack of Lua scripting :-(
Browsing the archives of grub-devel reveals that Lua support was moved to
grub-extras which makes me
